From alanf@dorje.com Thu Feb 1 06:07:33 2001 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:07:33 -0700 (MST) From: Alan Fleming alanf@dorje.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris/SysV style "ps" for Sparc/SunOS 4.1.3 Does anyone have a public domain replacement for "ps" that returns Solaris (aka SysV) style data (aka "ps -eaf" rather than "ps -aux" to get a complete process listing? I've tried digging through SunSolve and the GNU web site but haven't spotted anything. -- Think Peace. - Alan (alanf@dorje.com) http://www.dorje.com/~alanf/ KotBBBB (1988 GSXR1100J) RaceBike (FT500) DOD# 4210 PGP key available From matt@severian.chi.il.us Thu Feb 1 03:56:39 2001 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:56:39 -0600 From: Matt Crawford matt@severian.chi.il.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: Used Sun Machines > > i've long gotten away with > > stop-a > > or > > go > > Okay, I admit I've done that to, not that I would *recommend* > it (do as I say, not as I do). :-) It always worked for me, too, although I could always imagine reasons why I shouldn't be lucky each time. But never a problem. From tikeda@sprintmail.com Thu Feb 1 02:27:03 2001 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:27:03 -0500 From: Tim Ikeda tikeda@sprintmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 memory configuration question Hi all. I'm new to running and maintaining my own Sun systems. I've got a question about memory configurations: Is it true that SS10s can only accept 16MB and 64MB DSIMMs? That's what I'd assumed from reading the online manuals but I sometimes see 32MB DSIMMs offered on Ebay and described as being compatible with SS10s. I know SS20s can use those DSIMMs but I can't find any other references for SS10s. Also, I've never seen a source for the "nubs" used to mount hard drives in an SS10 chassis. What are some good substitutes? Thanks, Tim Ikeda (tikeda@sprintmail.com) From huge@huge.org.uk Thu Feb 1 14:07:40 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:07:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Huge huge@huge.org.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 memory configuration question > > Also, I've never seen a source for the "nubs" used to mount > hard drives in an SS10 chassis. What are some good substitutes? > I've seen a trick recommended here; buy appropriate machine screws from a hardware store, and cut down tap washers for the rubber bits... Saves the $24 that Sun (outrageously) want to for 4 screws and 4 rubber washers. H. From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Thu Feb 1 13:50:15 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:50:15 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: Solaris/SysV style "ps" for Sparc/SunOS 4.1.3 "From: Alan Fleming " "Does anyone have a public domain replacement for "ps" that returns "Solaris (aka SysV) style data (aka "ps -eaf" rather than "ps -aux" "to get a complete process listing? /usr/5bin/ps. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Thu Feb 1 13:49:19 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:49:19 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: SS10 memory configuration question "From: Tim Ikeda " "Is it true that SS10s can only accept 16MB and 64MB DSIMMs? officially... "That's what I'd assumed from reading the online manuals but "I sometimes see 32MB DSIMMs offered on Ebay and described "as being compatible with SS10s. I know SS20s can use those "DSIMMs but I can't find any other references for SS10s. unofficially, late-rev obp versions can recognize 32M dsimms. i don't know the cutoff. early revs treat them as either 16 or 64, i forget which. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From mike_thomas@yahoo.com Thu Feb 1 13:55:31 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 05:55:31 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Thomas mike_thomas@yahoo.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System I currently have a stable of two Suns - a MP Sparc10 and an Ultra 1 200E (three if you count the disabled IPC :-)). I run Solaris on both. I'm very happy with both, and particularly impressed by the Ultra's speed vs. my expectations of it (for example, it takes exactly the same amount of time to compile our entire Java project as my crappy 600mhz Celeron Windows laptop, and runs many tools faster). Anyway, to the point. I'm going to be in a position to buy even faster hardware very soon. However, I'm on the fence. There are many 300+ mhz Ultra units available on eBay (5, 10, 30, etc), with a monitor, roughly in my price range (around $2000). However, I could also buy a smoking dual-700 mhz Intel-based machine, and monitor, for about the same money, and run Linux on it. I love the exclusivity of having a "Sparc shop" at home. But I already have that, in a way. This time, I'm going to spend a more significant amount of money, and I want to ensure that I get appropriate value for it. I understand that the SPARC architecture has higher throughput, which may explain my Ultra's fine performance. However, I'm also given to understand that the Ultra 5 and 10 are not as "architecturally pure" as the other Ultras, and that makes me wonder whether they'll be less impressive at similar tasks than the "faster" PC hardware I can get for the same money. What do you guys think? If someone gave you $2k to spend and told you to choose between a SPARC from eBay and a dual 700 Pentium, what would you do? Not looking to start a religious war here, BTW, but I think it's an interesting proposition. Thanks... ---------------------------- This Old SPARC http://www.samoht.com/sparky ---------------------------- __________________________________________________ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ From nico@gartengold.de Thu Feb 1 13:12:37 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:12:37 +0100 From: Nico Goldschmidt nico@gartengold.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 memory configuration question Hi. > Is it true that SS10s can only accept 16MB and 64MB DSIMMs? > > That's what I'd assumed from reading the online manuals but > I sometimes see 32MB DSIMMs offered on Ebay and described > as being compatible with SS10s. I know SS20s can use those > DSIMMs but I can't find any other references for SS10s. This depends on your BootROM revision. The older ones treat the 32MB modules as 16MB, the newer ones recognize them correctly. I don't know which minimum revision is necessary, but the 32 MB modules didn't work in my SS10 with 2.12. After replacing it with 2.25 everything was OK. BootROM images for a replacement could be found at: http://lios.apana.org.au/~cdewick/data/bootroms.html Regards, Nico From mpotter@atpco.com Thu Feb 1 15:48:12 2001 Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 10:48:12 -0500 From: Matthew Potter mpotter@atpco.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Upgrading a Sparc 5 > >2) How would I upgrade this Sparc to 110mhz (or whatever the fastest proc > >was)? Is it as simple as locating a 110mhz processor on eBay and swapping > >them out? > > I'm no authority on that, but I would be quite doubtful that this would > be all it would take. If nothing else, I'd expect a crystal oscillator > would likely need to be replaced. Well desoldering a chip with a couple hundred pins(321 to be exact) is a pain in the ass.... if I remeber correctly the CPU isn't on a socket. You can also risk trashing the motherboard.... I'd just buy a 110 bare and then sell your 85 or something... Keep your ram and cards, etc.... the look on sun.com/microelectronics under MicroSPARC II they have a datasheet for the 70,85,110. And from looking at the sheet, I think you might need to do a little more than just swap CPU's..... Does Sun even make the 170 chip? From Jacob.Brodersen2@langley.af.mil Thu Feb 1 15:55:59 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:55:59 -0500 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F6dersen_Jacob_K_Civ_HQ_ACC/DRKI?= Jacob.Brodersen2@langley.af.mil Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System Mike, I'd take the $2K and find an Ultra 2 on eBay. I have an Ultra 1/140 and am very happy with it. Just wishing I could swing the Ultra 2. Maybe next year. Jake Ultra 1 Sparc 2 w/80Mhz Weitek -----Original Message----- From: Mike Thomas [mailto:mike_thomas@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 8:56 AM To: suns-at-home@net-kitchen.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System I currently have a stable of two Suns - a MP Sparc10 and an Ultra 1 200E (three if you count the disabled IPC :-)). I run Solaris on both. I'm very happy with both, and particularly impressed by the Ultra's speed vs. my expectations of it (for example, it takes exactly the same amount of time to compile our entire Java project as my crappy 600mhz Celeron Windows laptop, and runs many tools faster). Anyway, to the point. I'm going to be in a position to buy even faster hardware very soon. However, I'm on the fence. There are many 300+ mhz Ultra units available on eBay (5, 10, 30, etc), with a monitor, roughly in my price range (around $2000). However, I could also buy a smoking dual-700 mhz Intel-based machine, and monitor, for about the same money, and run Linux on it. I love the exclusivity of having a "Sparc shop" at home. But I already have that, in a way. This time, I'm going to spend a more significant amount of money, and I want to ensure that I get appropriate value for it. I understand that the SPARC architecture has higher throughput, which may explain my Ultra's fine performance. However, I'm also given to understand that the Ultra 5 and 10 are not as "architecturally pure" as the other Ultras, and that makes me wonder whether they'll be less impressive at similar tasks than the "faster" PC hardware I can get for the same money. What do you guys think? If someone gave you $2k to spend and told you to choose between a SPARC from eBay and a dual 700 Pentium, what would you do? Not looking to start a religious war here, BTW, but I think it's an interesting proposition. Thanks... ---------------------------- This Old SPARC http://www.samoht.com/sparky ---------------------------- From aad@talltree.net Thu Feb 1 18:34:23 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:34:23 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony A. D. Talltree aad@talltree.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris/SysV style "ps" for Sparc/SunOS 4.1.3 >Does anyone have a public domain replacement for "ps" that returns >Solaris (aka SysV) style data (aka "ps -eaf" rather than "ps -aux" >to get a complete process listing? Curious - I always use /usr/ucb/ps on SunOS5 because the SysV-style output is annoying. From bri@sonicboom.org Thu Feb 1 17:06:48 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:06:48 -0800 (PST) From: Brian bri@sonicboom.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System I also would do the Ultra 2, and go multiproc if cash allowed. I am not sure if thats enough dough to buy one from a reseller, as opposed to ebay, if that matters to you. The 5 is pretty speedy, but I believe the 5 and some other higher ultras have ide drives in them, so the question is do you want that? Bri On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-1] Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI wrote: > Mike, > > I'd take the $2K and find an Ultra 2 on eBay. I have an Ultra 1/140 and am > very happy with it. Just wishing I could swing the Ultra 2. Maybe next > year. > > Jake > Ultra 1 > Sparc 2 w/80Mhz Weitek > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Thomas [mailto:mike_thomas@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 8:56 AM > To: suns-at-home@net-kitchen.com > Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System > > > I currently have a stable of two Suns - a MP Sparc10 and an Ultra 1 > 200E (three if you count the disabled IPC :-)). I run Solaris on both. > I'm very happy with both, and particularly impressed by the Ultra's > speed vs. my expectations of it (for example, it takes exactly the same > amount of time to compile our entire Java project as my crappy 600mhz > Celeron Windows laptop, and runs many tools faster). > > Anyway, to the point. I'm going to be in a position to buy even faster > hardware very soon. However, I'm on the fence. There are many 300+ > mhz Ultra units available on eBay (5, 10, 30, etc), with a monitor, > roughly in my price range (around $2000). However, I could also buy a > smoking dual-700 mhz Intel-based machine, and monitor, for about the > same money, and run Linux on it. > > I love the exclusivity of having a "Sparc shop" at home. But I already > have that, in a way. This time, I'm going to spend a more significant > amount of money, and I want to ensure that I get appropriate value for > it. I understand that the SPARC architecture has higher throughput, > which may explain my Ultra's fine performance. However, I'm also given > to understand that the Ultra 5 and 10 are not as "architecturally pure" > as the other Ultras, and that makes me wonder whether they'll be less > impressive at similar tasks than the "faster" PC hardware I can get for > the same money. > > What do you guys think? If someone gave you $2k to spend and told you > to choose between a SPARC from eBay and a dual 700 Pentium, what would > you do? Not looking to start a religious war here, BTW, but I think > it's an interesting proposition. > > Thanks... > > ---------------------------- > This Old SPARC > http://www.samoht.com/sparky > ---------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From Jacob.Brodersen2@langley.af.mil Thu Feb 1 17:08:25 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:08:25 -0500 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F6dersen_Jacob_K_Civ_HQ_ACC/DRKI?= Jacob.Brodersen2@langley.af.mil Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System Brian, Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my PC is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. Jake From rcameron@engsoc.carleton.ca Thu Feb 1 17:06:05 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:06:05 -0500 (EST) From: Rob Cameron rcameron@engsoc.carleton.ca Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Upgrading a Sparc 5 I was under the impression Sun didn't make any of the CPUs that shipped with the Sparc 5. cat /etc/cpuinfo (in linux) on an 85 Mhz Sparc 5: cpu : Fujitsu MB86904 fpu : Lsi Logic/Meiko L64804 or compatible promlib : Version 3 Revision 2 prom : 2.15 type : sun4m ncpus probed : 1 ncpus active : 1 BogoMips : 84.78 MMU type : Fujitsu Swift invall : 0 invmm : 0 invrnge : 0 invpg : 0 contexts : 256 cat /etc/cpuinfo (again in linux) on a 170 Mhz Sparc 5: cpu : Fujitsu TurboSparc MB86907 fpu : reserved promlib : Version 3 Revision 2 prom : 2.29 type : sun4m ncpus probed : 1 ncpus active : 1 BogoMips : 169.57 MMU type : Fujitsu TurboSparc invall : 36 invmm : 1100 invrnge : 1547 invpg : 14450 contexts : 256 On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Matthew Potter wrote: > > > > >2) How would I upgrade this Sparc to 110mhz (or whatever the fastest proc > > >was)? Is it as simple as locating a 110mhz processor on eBay and swapping > > >them out? > > > > I'm no authority on that, but I would be quite doubtful that this would > > be all it would take. If nothing else, I'd expect a crystal oscillator > > would likely need to be replaced. > > Well desoldering a chip with a couple hundred pins(321 to be exact) is a pain > in the ass.... if I remeber correctly the CPU isn't on a socket. You can also > risk trashing the motherboard.... I'd just buy a 110 bare and then sell your > 85 or something... Keep your ram and cards, etc.... the look on > sun.com/microelectronics under MicroSPARC II they have a datasheet for the > 70,85,110. And from looking at the sheet, I think you might need to do a > little more than just swap CPU's..... > > Does Sun even make the 170 chip? > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From bri@sonicboom.org Thu Feb 1 17:35:29 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:35:29 -0800 (PST) From: Brian bri@sonicboom.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System Thats why I suggested the 1/2 first. IDE is getting better, and if this is for a home lan, and not enterprise, one of the ata100 IBM Deskstars is probably fast enuff, but if he either is in a many multiuser setting, or just desires to be a Sun purist, then scsi is the way to go. Bri On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-1] Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI wrote: > Brian, > > Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my PC > is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 > platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. > > Jake > From exec@dlc.fi Thu Feb 1 17:12:17 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:12:17 +0200 From: Michael Maier exec@dlc.fi Subject: [Suns-at-Home] spacclassic and memory? I have an sparcclassic with 2x4MB + 4x1MB simms, now i bough two 8MB simms. I heard that 36bit normal simms should be ok? Well i booted up the machine and it says you have 16MB of memory (i removed all other memorys to test these two). But then it says initializing memory and just stays there.. no reaction? So are my 8MB simms broken or what's wrong? Michael Maier From zu22@andrew.cmu.edu Thu Feb 1 19:05:08 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:05:08 -0500 (EST) From: Zachary Uram zu22@andrew.cmu.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System most PC have IDE drive, u need buy SCSI host adapter card if u want SCSI disk in PC On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI wrote: > Brian, > > Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my PC > is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 > platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. > > Jake > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > uram@cmu.edu "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have faith." - John 20:29 From negativl@best.com Fri Feb 2 00:16:08 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:16:08 -0800 (PST) From: Raymond Wong negativl@best.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Upgrading a Sparc 5 > I was under the impression Sun didn't make any of the CPUs that shipped > with the Sparc 5. Correct. Sun doesn't make CPUs. TI, LSI, Ross, Weitek, Fujitsu, etc. all made SPARC CPUs for Sun over the years. By the SS5 it was almost entirely TI and Fujitsu. > > in the ass.... if I remeber correctly the CPU isn't on a socket. You can also Depending on which subcontractor used, the SS5 might be socketed, or might be soldered directly to the board. The only sure way to know is to open up the box and look. Even if the CPU is socketed, you will likely find the osc and crystal are soldered. Look for an 8 pin SOIC surface mount chip and a 2 pin crystal. Look for the silkscreen indicating where the 4 pin osc would go. If it's not obvious to you, STOP. This is not a difficult process, but it's also not a trivial one. You should have enough electronics knowledge for it to already be clear what to do. Ray Wong PO BOX 6163 negativl at best.com, negativl at netcom.com Hayward, CA 94540-6163 Member #11537, Deborah Gibson International Fan Club Co-Founder and Charter Member, Sutton Foster International Fan Club From tikeda@sprintmail.com Fri Feb 2 00:21:40 2001 Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 19:21:40 -0500 From: Tim Ikeda tikeda@sprintmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 memory configuration question I asked: [...] >> Is it true that SS10s can only accept 16MB and 64MB DSIMMs? [...] Niko: >This depends on your BootROM revision. The older ones treat the >32MB modules as 16MB, the newer ones recognize them >correctly. I don't know which minimum revision is necessary, but >the 32 MB modules didn't work in my SS10 with 2.12. After >replacing it with 2.25 everything was OK. BootROM images for a >replacement could be found at: >http://lios.apana.org.au/~cdewick/data/bootroms.html Sounds great, and thanks for the info, Niko (and Andrew). I was concerned that the ability to use 32MB sims was a motherboard version sort of thing. One other question: Is there any specific way that the memory banks should be filled when using the 32 MB modules with other simms of mixed capacities? As for the HD mounting idea: Another excuse to get out my dremel. Thanks H. - Tim Ikeda (tikeda@sprintmail.com) From pinky@braincenter.de Thu Feb 1 23:28:18 2001 Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 00:28:18 +0100 From: Dirk Stapels pinky@braincenter.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System In my office we are using Ultra 2/2x300MHz with 1 Gig RAM. Some time ago we had some extra money to spend, so we bought 2 Ultra 5/360 with 512 MB. There is no single application where the U2 are not at least 3 to 10 times faster than the U5. If you want a fast maschine stay away from U5. New PCI-based suns are nice starting with the Ultra 60 which is way to expensive for use at home. Get a cheap U2 from ebay. Regards Dirk Mike Thomas schrieb: > I currently have a stable of two Suns - a MP Sparc10 and an Ultra 1 > 200E (three if you count the disabled IPC :-)). I run Solaris on both. > I'm very happy with both, and particularly impressed by the Ultra's > speed vs. my expectations of it (for example, it takes exactly the same > amount of time to compile our entire Java project as my crappy 600mhz > Celeron Windows laptop, and runs many tools faster). > > Anyway, to the point. I'm going to be in a position to buy even faster > hardware very soon. However, I'm on the fence. There are many 300+ > mhz Ultra units available on eBay (5, 10, 30, etc), with a monitor, > roughly in my price range (around $2000). However, I could also buy a > smoking dual-700 mhz Intel-based machine, and monitor, for about the > same money, and run Linux on it. > > I love the exclusivity of having a "Sparc shop" at home. But I already > have that, in a way. This time, I'm going to spend a more significant > amount of money, and I want to ensure that I get appropriate value for > it. I understand that the SPARC architecture has higher throughput, > which may explain my Ultra's fine performance. However, I'm also given > to understand that the Ultra 5 and 10 are not as "architecturally pure" > as the other Ultras, and that makes me wonder whether they'll be less > impressive at similar tasks than the "faster" PC hardware I can get for > the same money. > > What do you guys think? If someone gave you $2k to spend and told you > to choose between a SPARC from eBay and a dual 700 Pentium, what would > you do? Not looking to start a religious war here, BTW, but I think > it's an interesting proposition. > > Thanks... > > ---------------------------- > This Old SPARC > http://www.samoht.com/sparky > ---------------------------- > > __________________________________________________ > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From jdd@cs.toronto.edu Thu Feb 1 21:24:23 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:24:23 -0500 From: John DiMarco jdd@cs.toronto.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Upgrading a Sparc 5 In message you write: > >I was under the impression Sun didn't make any of the CPUs that shipped >with the Sparc 5. Sun doesn't manufacture _any_ CPUs, it gets TI/LSI/Fujitsu/etc. to do it for them. Sun designs them, though, in conjunction with their fab partners. Regards, John -- John DiMarco Office: SF2101 CSLab Systems Manager Phone: 416-978-5300 University of Toronto Fax: 416-978-1931 http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jdd From bdavies@hotmail.com Thu Feb 1 22:52:17 2001 Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 14:52:17 -0800 From: brian davies bdavies@hotmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System >From: Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI > >Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my >PC >is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 >platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. On the other hand, much as I vastly prefer SCSI, I'd be inclined to look at the U5/10 just for the PCI slots. My work box is a U10 with the Sun PCi card. If you need to run Windows (98/NT4/2000), but not as a primary machine this thing is mighty nice. And relatively cheap ($500 new, less from Sun auction on eBay). And if you go for a U5/10 I believe Sun has a reasonably priced (for Sun) SCSI card for them these days. If built-in SCSI is important to you, how about an Ultra 30? I've seen these pop up for around $2K - $3K fairly decently loaded. They were orphaned by Sun pretty quickly after they came since the price difference between the single processor only U30 wasn't that much cheaper than the dual processor capable U60. brian _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com From aad@talltree.net Thu Feb 1 20:00:48 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:00:48 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony A. D. Talltree aad@talltree.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System >Just say NO! to IDE drives. Hence the AXi. From s1gma@ureach.com Fri Feb 2 03:50:50 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:50:50 -0500 From: Steve Ashbrook s1gma@ureach.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sm81 cpu's for sale i have 4 sm81 cpu's. make an offer on any or all. contact me off list. ashbrook@crosswinds.net ________________________________________________ Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag From lonstein@agoron.com Fri Feb 2 03:15:19 2001 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:15:19 -0500 From: R. Lonstein lonstein@agoron.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Tatung Super Compstation 20sl Info? I am the owner of a Tatung Super CompStation 20, a SparcStation 20 clone. It's a nice machine and I've been using it as-is for months but I have no documentation for it and Tatung no longer sells the manuals nor offers them in electronic form. I have upgraded the RAM and HD successfully but I am considering a Ross CPU upgrade. My questions: * Does anyone have information on this model? * Is it really identical to the SS20? For example, the internal SCSI connector is HD68 with a 50pin ribbon adapter; are there any other differences? * Does the Tatung use a standard OpenBoot PROM (ie. can I just pop in a v2.25 PROM)? Thanks in advance, Ross From bdavies@hotmail.com Fri Feb 2 18:10:21 2001 Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 10:10:21 -0800 From: brian davies bdavies@hotmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System >>I wrote: >v_b wrote: >>My work box is a U10 with the Sun PCi card. If you need to run Windows >>(98/NT4/2000), but not as a primary machine this thing is mighty nice. >>And relatively cheap ($500 new, less from Sun auction on eBay). > >How does the Sun PCi work though? What kind of software does it need to >run Win32? Do you boot it to Solaris first and then run Windows??? When >we bought our U5s and a U10, we threw all those cards out of the boxes (the >machines were to be used solely as UNIX servers - enterprise servers, at >that). The card, for those of you who aren't familiar with it, takes up 2 PCI slots in the machine. There are two versions of the card. The older version has an AMD 400MHz cpu and two SIMM slots for up to 128 MB of it's own memory. The newer version is a Intel Celeron 600MHz cpu and will support up to 512 MB memory. Both have their own paralell and serial ports, a USB port, audio in/out, and will support it's own monitor. The older card, at least, uses standard PC memory (PC133 I believe). Non-Sun memory voids the warranty, but I haven't had any problems so far. It can either share your SPARC's IP address, or have its own (I think - mine is sharing the IP). You need to supply your own Windows software with the card. The card I have supports 98 and NT4, which is what I'm running. The new card supports 98, NT4, and 2000. I'm guessing that the version I have supports 2000, but I don't have enough of a need to change to deal with upgrading. The operation of the card is very similar to the old SunPC software for the folks that have used it - although the performance is much better since I'm not sharing memory with my SPARC anymore. To use the card, you boot into Solaris and then launch the SunPCi application. This opens up a window and get to watch the standard Microsoft booting process. To load the software you basically assign a chunk of disk over to the card which becomes your C:\ drive. Once you're loaded up, the Windows portion of the machine can join your NT domain and play all of the reindeer games you'd expect from a PC. There are also a number of utilities that let you transfer files back and forth between your Unix and PC filesystems. The card has been very useful for me since I only have the one machine, but I can still run things like Visio. Any interest in getting rid of one of the cards you yanked out? I've been thinking about upgrading my box at home specifically so I can get one of the Sun PCi cards. StarOffice doesn't quite cut it for my wife when she's working at home and it would be nice to have access to the Windows apps without supporting a second machine. Let me know offline. brian _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com From aad@talltree.net Fri Feb 2 16:50:19 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:50:19 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony A. D. Talltree aad@talltree.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System >On the other hand, much as I vastly prefer SCSI, I'd be inclined to look at >the U5/10 just for the PCI slots. So get an AXi or an AXdp. From bri@sonicboom.org Fri Feb 2 17:59:52 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:59:52 -0800 (PST) From: Brian bri@sonicboom.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris is downloadable now Sun ISO images are downloadable now for Sparc and Intel.. http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/binaries/get.html Brian From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Fri Feb 2 13:33:07 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:33:07 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: SS10 memory configuration question "From: Tim Ikeda " "One other question: Is there any specific way that the "memory banks should be filled when using the 32 MB modules "with other simms of mixed capacities? i believe sun recommended sorting them by size and installing the biggest first. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From v_bender@hotmail.com Fri Feb 2 15:34:12 2001 Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:34:12 +0200 From: v b v_bender@hotmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System >From: "brian davies" >To: Jacob.Brodersen2@langley.af.mil, bri@sonicboom.org >CC: suns-at-home@net-kitchen.com >Subject: RE: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System >Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 14:52:17 -0800 >X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 > >My work box is a U10 with the Sun PCi card. If you need to run Windows >(98/NT4/2000), but not as a primary machine this thing is mighty nice. And >relatively cheap ($500 new, less from Sun auction on eBay). How does the Sun PCi work though? What kind of software does it need to run Win32? Do you boot it to Solaris first and then run Windows??? When we bought our U5s and a U10, we threw all those cards out of the boxes (the machines were to be used solely as UNIX servers - enterprise servers, at that). _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From jdd@cs.toronto.edu Fri Feb 2 14:33:52 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:33:52 -0500 From: John DiMarco jdd@cs.toronto.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System Dirk Stapels writes: >In my office we are using Ultra 2/2x300MHz with 1 Gig RAM. Some time ago >we had some extra money to spend, so we bought 2 Ultra 5/360 with 512 MB. >There is no single application where the U2 are not at least 3 to 10 times >faster than the U5. If you want a fast maschine stay away from U5. New >PCI-based suns are nice starting with the Ultra 60 which is way to >expensive for use at home. Get a cheap U2 from ebay. Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI Writes: >Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my PC >is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 >platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. It's best to approach these comparisons with a little bit of thought. Dirk's Ultra 5/360 has a small 256k secondary cache; his Ultra 2/2300 has at least a 1MB secondary cache. No doubt this has a certain effect on the performance comparison. As for Jacob's concerns about EIDE, well, the Ultra 5 doesn't come with a particularly quick EIDE drive, and further, Sun's SPARC/Solaris IDE drivers are not as spritely as they could be. But there's nothing wrong with the Ultra 5/10 itself. If you need a large secondary cache, get a model that has a large cache. If you need a faster hard drive, replace the slow one that Sun provides. If you need SCSI, add a SCSI controller. Quit complaining about how the Ultra 5 is slow -- it's not, if you configure it properly. Regards, John -- John DiMarco Office: SF2101 CSLab Systems Manager Phone: 416-978-5300 University of Toronto Fax: 416-978-1931 http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jdd From jrankin@jeffr.net Fri Feb 2 20:33:12 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:33:12 -0500 (EST) From: W. Jeffrey Rankin jrankin@jeffr.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, John DiMarco wrote: > Dirk Stapels writes: > >In my office we are using Ultra 2/2x300MHz with 1 Gig RAM. Some time ago > >we had some extra money to spend, so we bought 2 Ultra 5/360 with 512 MB. > >There is no single application where the U2 are not at least 3 to 10 times > >faster than the U5. If you want a fast maschine stay away from U5. New > >PCI-based suns are nice starting with the Ultra 60 which is way to > >expensive for use at home. Get a cheap U2 from ebay. > > Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI Writes: > >Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my PC > >is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 > >platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. > > It's best to approach these comparisons with a little bit of thought. Dirk's > Ultra 5/360 has a small 256k secondary cache; his Ultra 2/2300 has at least a > 1MB secondary cache. No doubt this has a certain effect on the performance > comparison. As for Jacob's concerns about EIDE, well, the Ultra 5 doesn't > come with a particularly quick EIDE drive, and further, Sun's SPARC/Solaris > IDE drivers are not as spritely as they could be. The Ultra 5 (400MHz) I picked up new (direct from Sun) a few months ago came with a fairly fast (7200 rpm) 9 gig disk, and 1 meg cache. I've heard that older models only came with a 5000 rpm (or something like that) disk and the 256K cache you mentioned. I've been very happy with this machine for the kind of development work I do (Web work, Perl scripting, LaTeX development, etc., some 2-D graphics). Direct from Sun, I paid about $1950.00. I do have a Dual-pentium 450 that I develop on as well, and while NT and 2000 run wonderfully with this box, Linux honestly didn't seem to take advantage of the machines capability. This was a while back, however, and perhaps Linux now takes better advantage of SMP. Another problem was video support, Linux didn't take advantage of the 3-D Labs card in the machine, which just seemed too much of a waste to me. I'd forget Ebay, and get a new Ultra 5 or 10 from direct from Sun. Note that this doesn't include the monitor. Just my thoughts! - Jeff From pinky@braincenter.de Fri Feb 2 20:58:22 2001 Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 21:58:22 +0100 From: Dirk Stapels pinky@braincenter.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System Hi Mike, several of the guys told you to buy an AXi board. Think that is a good idea. Fits into ATX-Chassis so you can build up your own system. Just take care you don't take the 360MHz/256KB CPU. According to my local dealer it is like JohnDiMarco said in his EMail. The smaller cache slows it down. 333MHz/1MB is a lot faster. But hard to get. Saw two AXis on Ebay Germany some weeks ago. Were sold for about $300 incl. 360 CPU. Might be something you should look for. Specs are on the SunServer. regards Dirk Mike Thomas schrieb: > Thanks. That's exactly the kind of hard performance info I was looking > for. Believe me, I'd love to have an Ultra 2. Problem is, there are > no "cheap" U2's on eBay - they're all way out of my price range, i.e. > $3-$5k. > > Thanks again... > > --- Dirk Stapels wrote: > > In my office we are using Ultra 2/2x300MHz with 1 Gig RAM. Some time > > ago > > we had some extra money to spend, so we bought 2 Ultra 5/360 with 512 > > MB. > > There is no single application where the U2 are not at least 3 to 10 > > times > > faster than the U5. If you want a fast maschine stay away from U5. > > New > > PCI-based suns are nice starting with the Ultra 60 which is way to > > expensive for use at home. Get a cheap U2 from ebay. > > > > Regards > > > > Dirk > > > > > > Mike Thomas schrieb: > > > > > I currently have a stable of two Suns - a MP Sparc10 and an Ultra 1 > > > 200E (three if you count the disabled IPC :-)). I run Solaris on > > both. > > > I'm very happy with both, and particularly impressed by the > > Ultra's > > > speed vs. my expectations of it (for example, it takes exactly the > > same > > > amount of time to compile our entire Java project as my crappy > > 600mhz > > > Celeron Windows laptop, and runs many tools faster). > > > > > > Anyway, to the point. I'm going to be in a position to buy even > > faster > > > hardware very soon. However, I'm on the fence. There are many > > 300+ > > > mhz Ultra units available on eBay (5, 10, 30, etc), with a monitor, > > > roughly in my price range (around $2000). However, I could also > > buy a > > > smoking dual-700 mhz Intel-based machine, and monitor, for about > > the > > > same money, and run Linux on it. > > > > > > I love the exclusivity of having a "Sparc shop" at home. But I > > already > > > have that, in a way. This time, I'm going to spend a more > > significant > > > amount of money, and I want to ensure that I get appropriate value > > for > > > it. I understand that the SPARC architecture has higher > > throughput, > > > which may explain my Ultra's fine performance. However, I'm also > > given > > > to understand that the Ultra 5 and 10 are not as "architecturally > > pure" > > > as the other Ultras, and that makes me wonder whether they'll be > > less > > > impressive at similar tasks than the "faster" PC hardware I can get > > for > > > the same money. > > > > > > What do you guys think? If someone gave you $2k to spend and told > > you > > > to choose between a SPARC from eBay and a dual 700 Pentium, what > > would > > > you do? Not looking to start a religious war here, BTW, but I > > think > > > it's an interesting proposition. > > > > > > Thanks... > > > > > > ---------------------------- > > > This Old SPARC > > > http://www.samoht.com/sparky > > > ---------------------------- > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > > > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Suns-at-Home mailing list > > > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > > > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > > > > ===== > --------------------- > Mike Thomas > http://www.samoht.com > It's better backwards > --------------------- > > __________________________________________________ > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ From exec@dlc.fi Fri Feb 2 21:40:47 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:40:47 +0200 From: Michael Maier exec@dlc.fi Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sparc and disk suspend? Is it possible to suspend harddisk(sparcclassic/scsi)? I'm using NetBSD and there are no disk activity at nights when i'm sleeping ;) so i tought it would be little more quiet if it's possible to suspend the harddisk. Michaeö From nico@gartengold.de Fri Feb 2 21:34:54 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:34:54 +0100 From: Nico Goldschmidt nico@gartengold.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 memory configuration question Hi Tim. > One other question: Is there any specific way that the > memory banks should be filled when using the 32 MB modules > with other simms of mixed capacities? You have to start with the biggest module in Slot J0201 and the fill up in the following order: J0304, J0203, J0302, J0303, J0301, J0305, J0202. For further information have a look at the Service Manual: http://docs.sun.com:80/ab2/coll.208.1/SMSS10/@Ab2TocView?Ab 2Lang=de&Ab2Enc=iso-8859-1 Regards, Nico From bri@sonicboom.org Sat Feb 3 01:34:02 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:34:02 -0800 (PST) From: Brian bri@sonicboom.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System ack, make that www.sun.com/auctions. Bri On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Brian wrote: > By the way, new from Sun ebay listings can be found starting at > auctions.sun.com, though the page is unavailable at the moment, and I also > see the ultra5 now sporting a 2mb l2 cache. > > Bri > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, W. Jeffrey Rankin wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, John DiMarco wrote: > > > > > Dirk Stapels writes: > > > >In my office we are using Ultra 2/2x300MHz with 1 Gig RAM. Some time ago > > > >we had some extra money to spend, so we bought 2 Ultra 5/360 with 512 MB. > > > >There is no single application where the U2 are not at least 3 to 10 times > > > >faster than the U5. If you want a fast maschine stay away from U5. New > > > >PCI-based suns are nice starting with the Ultra 60 which is way to > > > >expensive for use at home. Get a cheap U2 from ebay. > > > > > > Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI Writes: > > > >Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my PC > > > >is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 > > > >platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. > > > > > > It's best to approach these comparisons with a little bit of thought. Dirk's > > > Ultra 5/360 has a small 256k secondary cache; his Ultra 2/2300 has at least a > > > 1MB secondary cache. No doubt this has a certain effect on the performance > > > comparison. As for Jacob's concerns about EIDE, well, the Ultra 5 doesn't > > > come with a particularly quick EIDE drive, and further, Sun's SPARC/Solaris > > > IDE drivers are not as spritely as they could be. > > > > The Ultra 5 (400MHz) I picked up new (direct from Sun) a few months ago > > came with a fairly fast (7200 rpm) 9 gig disk, and 1 meg cache. I've heard > > that older models only came with a 5000 rpm (or something like that) disk > > and the 256K cache you mentioned. > > > > I've been very happy with this machine for the kind of development work I > > do (Web work, Perl scripting, LaTeX development, etc., some 2-D > > graphics). Direct from Sun, I paid about $1950.00. > > > > I do have a Dual-pentium 450 that I develop on as well, and while NT and > > 2000 run wonderfully with this box, Linux honestly didn't seem to take > > advantage of the machines capability. This was a while back, however, and > > perhaps Linux now takes better advantage of SMP. Another problem was video > > support, Linux didn't take advantage of the 3-D Labs card in the machine, > > which just seemed too much of a waste to me. > > > > I'd forget Ebay, and get a new Ultra 5 or 10 from direct from Sun. Note > > that this doesn't include the monitor. > > > > Just my thoughts! > > - Jeff > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Suns-at-Home mailing list > > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > > > > From bri@sonicboom.org Sat Feb 3 01:32:01 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:32:01 -0800 (PST) From: Brian bri@sonicboom.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System By the way, new from Sun ebay listings can be found starting at auctions.sun.com, though the page is unavailable at the moment, and I also see the ultra5 now sporting a 2mb l2 cache. Bri On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, W. Jeffrey Rankin wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, John DiMarco wrote: > > > Dirk Stapels writes: > > >In my office we are using Ultra 2/2x300MHz with 1 Gig RAM. Some time ago > > >we had some extra money to spend, so we bought 2 Ultra 5/360 with 512 MB. > > >There is no single application where the U2 are not at least 3 to 10 times > > >faster than the U5. If you want a fast maschine stay away from U5. New > > >PCI-based suns are nice starting with the Ultra 60 which is way to > > >expensive for use at home. Get a cheap U2 from ebay. > > > > Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI Writes: > > >Just say NO! to IDE drives. SCSI rules in the enterprise arena. Even my PC > > >is running Ultra160 SCSI. It just plain rocks!!! Stick with the Ultra 1/2 > > >platforms. The U/5 just doesn't do anything for me. > > > > It's best to approach these comparisons with a little bit of thought. Dirk's > > Ultra 5/360 has a small 256k secondary cache; his Ultra 2/2300 has at least a > > 1MB secondary cache. No doubt this has a certain effect on the performance > > comparison. As for Jacob's concerns about EIDE, well, the Ultra 5 doesn't > > come with a particularly quick EIDE drive, and further, Sun's SPARC/Solaris > > IDE drivers are not as spritely as they could be. > > The Ultra 5 (400MHz) I picked up new (direct from Sun) a few months ago > came with a fairly fast (7200 rpm) 9 gig disk, and 1 meg cache. I've heard > that older models only came with a 5000 rpm (or something like that) disk > and the 256K cache you mentioned. > > I've been very happy with this machine for the kind of development work I > do (Web work, Perl scripting, LaTeX development, etc., some 2-D > graphics). Direct from Sun, I paid about $1950.00. > > I do have a Dual-pentium 450 that I develop on as well, and while NT and > 2000 run wonderfully with this box, Linux honestly didn't seem to take > advantage of the machines capability. This was a while back, however, and > perhaps Linux now takes better advantage of SMP. Another problem was video > support, Linux didn't take advantage of the 3-D Labs card in the machine, > which just seemed too much of a waste to me. > > I'd forget Ebay, and get a new Ultra 5 or 10 from direct from Sun. Note > that this doesn't include the monitor. > > Just my thoughts! > - Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From aad@talltree.net Sat Feb 3 02:30:24 2001 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:30:24 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony A. D. Talltree aad@talltree.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] re: AXi speeds >Just take >care you don't take the 360MHz/256KB CPU. According to my local dealer >it is like JohnDiMarco said in his EMail. The smaller cache slows it down. >333MHz/1MB is a lot faster And the 440/2MB? From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Sat Feb 3 06:16:18 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 01:16:18 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: sparc and disk suspend? "From: "Michael Maier" " "Is it possible to suspend harddisk(sparcclassic/scsi)? I'm using NetBSD and "there are no disk activity at nights when i'm sleeping ;) so i tought it "would be little more quiet if it's possible to suspend the harddisk. i believe that 'sleep' mode is supported on the classic. you need solaris 2.6 or later [maybe 2.5?] and the power management packages. dunno if anyone else has drivers for the power chips. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From gnichols@qwest.net Sat Feb 3 12:02:08 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 05:02:08 -0700 From: Gary Nichols gnichols@qwest.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun Memory? Or Not Sun Memory? First of all, thank you all for your answers to my question on upgrading my sparc 5. I'm definately asking questions in the right place. :) I was wondering if anyone on this list could look at these two pictures of memory I recently purchased: http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory1.jpg http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory2.jpg And tell me what the heck do they go to? The seller told me he though they were Sun memory??? I've searched the vast reaches of the internet and now my head hurts. Cheers, Gary From gnichols@qwest.net Sat Feb 3 17:38:57 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 10:38:57 -0700 From: Gary Nichols gnichols@qwest.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun Memory? Or Not Sun Memory? Thank you all for the fantastic (and FAST) feedback I've gotten. You guys are the best! Here's the '501' number as requested... 501262278066681 Best Regards, Gary -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Williams [ Aka Mowat ] [mailto:mowat@wolfsong.net] Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 10:32 AM To: Gary Nichols Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Sun Memory? Or Not Sun Memory? They are sun memory probably for an ultra 1-2 or a sparc 20 look/get the 501 number up there at the top of the strip that is the sun part number Matthew Gary Nichols wrote: > First of all, thank you all for your answers to my question on upgrading my > sparc 5. I'm definately asking questions in the right place. :) > > I was wondering if anyone on this list could look at these two pictures of > memory I recently purchased: > > http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory1.jpg > http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory2.jpg > > And tell me what the heck do they go to? The seller told me he though they > were Sun memory??? > > I've searched the vast reaches of the internet and now my head hurts. > > Cheers, > > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From jeffw@smoe.org Sat Feb 3 17:28:25 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:28:25 -0500 From: Jeff Wasilko jeffw@smoe.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun Memory? Or Not Sun Memory? On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 05:02:08AM -0700, Gary Nichols wrote: > First of all, thank you all for your answers to my question on upgrading my > sparc 5. I'm definately asking questions in the right place. :) > > I was wondering if anyone on this list could look at these two pictures of > memory I recently purchased: > > http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory1.jpg > http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory2.jpg > > And tell me what the heck do they go to? The seller told me he though they > were Sun memory??? It looks like Sparc10/20/Ultra memory. If you can get me the part number from the tiny barcode strip (5xx-xxxx) I can tell you what it really is. -jeff From bcook@idsi.net Sat Feb 3 18:59:24 2001 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 13:59:24 -0500 From: B. Cook bcook@idsi.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1's and Ultra10's Has anyone successfully put something other that linux and solaris on one of these? I'm trying to load NetBSD (which they say that in 1.5 all the Ultra's are supported). It needs to be loaded either from Solaris or you can do a tftp install but I just seem to be having alot of trouble with it; Just wondering if anyone has successfully done it. I got slackware for Ultra @ linux-expo the other day, and spoke to the people at the NetBSD booth but they (bsd folks) didn't know much about the Ultra's install. Any help would be greatly appreciated Brian From garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Mon Feb 5 04:07:38 2001 Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 22:07:38 -0600 From: Garry Garrett garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Tatung Super Compstation 20sl Info? Sorry, I know very little about Tatung other than they are the only Clone maker that still makes their own motherboards (the rest of them buy motherboards from Sun). If they make their own boards, they may well make their own PROMs, perhaps with their own firmware. "R. Lonstein" wrote: > > I am the owner of a Tatung Super CompStation 20, a SparcStation 20 > clone. It's a nice machine and I've been using it as-is for months but > I have no documentation for it and Tatung no longer sells the manuals > nor offers them in electronic form. I have upgraded the RAM and HD > successfully but I am considering a Ross CPU upgrade. > > My questions: > * Does anyone have information on this model? > * Is it really identical to the SS20? For example, the internal SCSI > connector is HD68 with a 50pin ribbon adapter; are there any other > differences? > * Does the Tatung use a standard OpenBoot PROM (ie. can I just pop in a > v2.25 PROM)? > > Thanks in advance, > Ross > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home -- Garry Garrett http://garrett.no-ip.com/ ._o o __o |> <\ -\<, 4 . . .. /> . . .. ...O/ O From mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Sun Feb 4 04:21:56 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 23:21:56 -0500 (EST) From: der Mouse mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1's and Ultra10's > Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1's and Ultra10's > I'm trying to load NetBSD (which they say that in 1.5 all the Ultra's > are supported). It needs to be loaded either from Solaris or you can > do a tftp install but I just seem to be having alot of trouble with > it; Just wondering if anyone has successfully done it. I haven't, but I do have a remark: I have found that quite often, the least painful way to install on a new machine is to pop the disk on another machine and set it up there. Sometimes this means building machine A's installboot (or whatever port A uses for that) on machine B, but that's often less hair than trying to convince install procedures to DTRT. Another alternative which has been known to work for me is to boot the new machine completely diskless, get it working that way, and only then connect up a disk and do an install onto it. If you're in Montreal I can drop by and see what I can do...but that seems unlikely. :-( der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From jeffw@smoe.org Sat Feb 3 19:20:42 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:20:42 -0500 From: Jeff Wasilko jeffw@smoe.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun Memory? Or Not Sun Memory? On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 10:38:57AM -0700, Gary Nichols wrote: > > Thank you all for the fantastic (and FAST) feedback I've gotten. You guys > are the best! Here's the '501' number as requested... > 501262278066681 They're 32M simms for Ultra boxes: http://www.memoryx.net/x7002a.html > > Best Regards, > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Williams [ Aka Mowat ] [mailto:mowat@wolfsong.net] > Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 10:32 AM > To: Gary Nichols > Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Sun Memory? Or Not Sun Memory? > > > They are sun memory probably for an ultra 1-2 or a sparc 20 > look/get the 501 number up there at the top of the strip that is > the sun part number > > Matthew > > Gary Nichols wrote: > > > First of all, thank you all for your answers to my question on upgrading > my > > sparc 5. I'm definately asking questions in the right place. :) > > > > I was wondering if anyone on this list could look at these two pictures of > > memory I recently purchased: > > > > http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory1.jpg > > http://www.garynichols.com/content/ebay/memory2.jpg > > > > And tell me what the heck do they go to? The seller told me he though > they > > were Sun memory??? > > > > I've searched the vast reaches of the internet and now my head hurts. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Gary > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Suns-at-Home mailing list > > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Mon Feb 5 04:19:22 2001 Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 22:19:22 -0600 From: Garry Garrett garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sparc and disk suspend? Michael Maier wrote: > > Is it possible to suspend harddisk(sparcclassic/scsi)? I'm using NetBSD and > there are no disk activity at nights when i'm sleeping ;) so i tought it > would be little more quiet if it's possible to suspend the harddisk. You could shutdown and power down the system. Aside from that, there are (probably) daemons that are actually writing (perhaps to /var) during the night, as long as your Sun is still running. Some hard drives, drives that were designed to run 7x24, have a lubricant that can gel up if it sits for too long (particularly in a cold room, which is probably not the case with you). This problem, known as "sticktion", makes me warry of shutting down SCSI hard drives (particularly 1GB-4GB ones, which are the right vintage for having this problem, Seagate ST32550 2GB drives, which were popular for Suns, are known to have this problem). If this is a noise problem, the thing that makes the most noise is probably the fan. You'll want to shut down the system to shutdown the fan. Another idea is to get an extension cord for the monitor and keyboard, and put your system somewhere farther away, like in another room. Just a thought. -- Garry Garrett http://garrett.no-ip.com/ ._o o __o |> <\ -\<, 4 . . .. /> . . .. ...O/ O From mjevans@bellatlantic.net Sat Feb 3 15:13:16 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:13:16 -0000 From: mjevans mjevans@bellatlantic.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ss5 memory Hello everyone. I am new to this so I hope I am not asking a stupid question. I recently purchased a ss5 and I have been told that I can use certain dimms from Mac system. as long as it is 5v parity. is this true ? thanks for you assistance. Mike From billj@ieee.org Sun Feb 4 01:26:52 2001 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 17:26:52 -0800 From: Bill Janssen billj@ieee.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Extra 4 meg 30 pin SIMMs I picked up a double handful of 4 Meg 30 pin SIMMs today and don't really have any use for them. You pay shipping and any gratuity you thing suitable. I have 32 of them. Some are (I think) 70 nanosecond and some are 80 Nanosecond. Bill K7NOM (shipping from Sacramento California) From mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Sun Feb 4 00:52:16 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 19:52:16 -0500 (EST) From: der Mouse mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sparc and disk suspend? > Is it possible to suspend harddisk(sparcclassic/scsi)? This is a question for your OS, mostly; the hardware has comparatively little to do with it (for most meanings of "suspend"). If you mean turn off power to the disk, most hardware can't do that, though laptops may be set up to. If you mean just spin it down, that's comparatively easy. > I'm using NetBSD and there are no disk activity at nights when i'm > sleeping ;) so i tought it would be little more quiet if it's > possible to suspend the harddisk. In principle, yes, assuming there is any command the disk is willing to interpret as "spin down". (Opcode 0x1b, with 0x00 in the fifth byte, looks promising.) AFAIK the drivers aren't set up to do it. I'll play with it some when I get some free time and see if I can hack in code to do this (and, of course, spin the disk back up on next access). der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From negativl@best.com Sat Feb 3 22:14:20 2001 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:14:20 -0800 (PST) From: Raymond Wong negativl@best.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun Memory? Or Not Sun Memory? Gary Nichols wrote: > > Thank you all for the fantastic (and FAST) feedback I've gotten. You guys > are the best! Here's the '501' number as requested... > 501262278066681 Looks like a 32Meg for SS20, if memory serves... definitely in that era. has anyone found a source of the old portable sized FE handbooks, btw? Ray Ray Wong PO BOX 6163 negativl at best.com, negativl at netcom.com Hayward, CA 94540-6163 Member #11537, Deborah Gibson International Fan Club Co-Founder and Charter Member, Sutton Foster International Fan Club From bruce@pullig.com Mon Feb 5 16:05:35 2001 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:05:35 -0600 From: Bruce Pullig bruce@pullig.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Tatung Super Compstation 20sl Info? I have both a Tatung 20s and a Sun SPARCstation 20 with Ross RT-626 CPUs(200Mhz) and the prom in both are 2.25R. Bruce Pullig bruce@pullig.com www.pullig.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Garry Garrett To: R. Lonstein Cc: suns-at-home@net-kitchen.com Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 10:07 PM Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Tatung Super Compstation 20sl Info? Sorry, I know very little about Tatung other than they are the only Clone maker that still makes their own motherboards (the rest of them buy motherboards from Sun). If they make their own boards, they may well make their own PROMs, perhaps with their own firmware. "R. Lonstein" wrote: > > I am the owner of a Tatung Super CompStation 20, a SparcStation 20 > clone. It's a nice machine and I've been using it as-is for months but > I have no documentation for it and Tatung no longer sells the manuals > nor offers them in electronic form. I have upgraded the RAM and HD > successfully but I am considering a Ross CPU upgrade. > > My questions: > * Does anyone have information on this model? > * Is it really identical to the SS20? For example, the internal SCSI > connector is HD68 with a 50pin ribbon adapter; are there any other > differences? > * Does the Tatung use a standard OpenBoot PROM (ie. can I just pop in a > v2.25 PROM)? > > Thanks in advance, > Ross > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home -- Garry Garrett http://garrett.no-ip.com/ ._o o __o |> <\ -\<, 4 . . .. /> . . .. ...O/ O _______________________________________________ Suns-at-Home mailing list Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From aad@talltree.net Mon Feb 5 18:47:58 2001 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:47:58 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony A. D. Talltree aad@talltree.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Tatung Super Compstation 20sl Info? >Sorry, I know very little about Tatung other than they are the >only Clone maker that still makes their own motherboards Perhaps for some models, but my U10-style machine is an AXi. From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Mon Feb 5 19:49:15 2001 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:49:15 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: Ultra1's and Ultra10's "From: der Mouse " "Another alternative which has been known to work for me is to boot the "new machine completely diskless, get it working that way, and only then "connect up a disk and do an install onto it. [putting on pro hat] this is also an excellent way to do disaster recovery in a networked env where some machines still have critical local data. install replacement disk, boot diskless, do net restore from archives, reboot from local disk... _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From 2beds@home.com Tue Feb 6 00:35:24 2001 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:35:24 -0500 From: Kim & Kyle Bedell 2beds@home.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System Anyone whos anyone oughta check here ------------> www.tomshardware.com if u still think IDE drives are slow,........here's a wake up call. regards Kyle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony A. D. Talltree" To: "'Brian'" ; "Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI" Cc: "'suns-at-hme@net-kitchen.com'" Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:00 PM Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System > >Just say NO! to IDE drives. > > Hence the AXi. > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From mule@coastalnet.com Wed Feb 7 21:12:48 2001 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:12:48 -0500 From: Mule mule@coastalnet.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 Hard drive options I'm in need of a short education on the SS10 hard drive. I've been upgrading my recently purchased Sparc 10 (although I still have no idea what I'm going to do with it when it's 'finished') and now it's time to add some storage. I've searched around on the web/ebay/sun and what I've seen leads me to believe that the largest internal hard drive option is about one gig (not much bigger than my current drive). It also looks like the hard drive for the Sparc 4/5/20 is different from the 10, but I haven't sorted out exactly what the difference is. I believe that any (Sun) external drive will work fine, but what I'd really like is two 4 to 9 gig internal drives. Is there an option to mount a drive this large internally in the SS10? Jim "Mule" Harvey mule@coastalnet.com From david@catwhisker.org Thu Feb 8 02:26:04 2001 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 18:26:04 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 Hard drive options >From: "Mule" >Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:12:48 -0500 >I'm in need of a short education on the SS10 hard drive. I've been >upgrading my recently purchased Sparc 10 (although I still have no idea what >I'm going to do with it when it's 'finished') :-) >and now it's time to add some >storage. I've searched around on the web/ebay/sun and what I've seen leads >me to believe that the largest internal hard drive option is about one gig >(not much bigger than my current drive). That sounds believable -- but mostly because of the "form factor" of the drive. Other folks will, I'm sure, clarify & elaborate, but: >It also looks like the hard drive >for the Sparc 4/5/20 is different from the 10, but I haven't sorted out >exactly what the difference is. Yes, it is. The SS10 uses a fairly standard narrow SCSI (50-pin) connector, while the others you mention use a (fast, I think) "SCA" (80-pin) connector (which includes SCSI ID & power). >I believe that any (Sun) external drive >will work fine, but what I'd really like is two 4 to 9 gig internal drives. >Is there an option to mount a drive this large internally in the SS10? As I recall -- and it's been a while since I opened up an SS10 -- the issues are: * Form factor: * Does it fit (at all)? * Can it be screwed into place so it doesn't move around if you move the chassis? * Connector -- 50-pin narrow SCSI, as above. I believe the ribbon cable (with the necessary drops) should already be there. Ideally, the last device on the cable is terminated, and you have an internal drop available for connected an unterminated drive. And be sure you don't have a SCSI (target) ID conflict. * Heat -- some of the older drives were pretty notorious for this. You can bypass a fair amount of this (at some cost in desk space & noise) by using an external chassis for SCSI devices. But it may be easier to deal with form factors that make in-chassis placement problematical... and avoid overheating the SS10 proper. Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. From bri@sonicboom.org Thu Feb 8 03:00:43 2001 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:00:43 -0800 (PST) From: Brian bri@sonicboom.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 Hard drive options I have a sparc 4, both the 4 and 5 use sca, its a different connector than that in the 10. I saw a sparc 20 with a pair of 4 gig cheetahs, no reason to think this same setup wouldn't fit in the 10. http://www.memoryx.net/sparc10hdd.html shows a 1 and a 4.5 gig drive. Brian On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, David Wolfskill wrote: > >From: "Mule" > >Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:12:48 -0500 > > >I'm in need of a short education on the SS10 hard drive. I've been > >upgrading my recently purchased Sparc 10 (although I still have no idea what > >I'm going to do with it when it's 'finished') > > :-) > > >and now it's time to add some > >storage. I've searched around on the web/ebay/sun and what I've seen leads > >me to believe that the largest internal hard drive option is about one gig > >(not much bigger than my current drive). > > That sounds believable -- but mostly because of the "form factor" of the > drive. > > Other folks will, I'm sure, clarify & elaborate, but: > > >It also looks like the hard drive > >for the Sparc 4/5/20 is different from the 10, but I haven't sorted out > >exactly what the difference is. > > Yes, it is. The SS10 uses a fairly standard narrow SCSI (50-pin) > connector, while the others you mention use a (fast, I think) "SCA" > (80-pin) connector (which includes SCSI ID & power). > > >I believe that any (Sun) external drive > >will work fine, but what I'd really like is two 4 to 9 gig internal drives. > >Is there an option to mount a drive this large internally in the SS10? > > As I recall -- and it's been a while since I opened up an SS10 -- the > issues are: > > * Form factor: > * Does it fit (at all)? > * Can it be screwed into place so it doesn't move around if you move > the chassis? > * Connector -- 50-pin narrow SCSI, as above. I believe the ribbon cable > (with the necessary drops) should already be there. Ideally, the last > device on the cable is terminated, and you have an internal drop > available for connected an unterminated drive. And be sure you don't > have a SCSI (target) ID conflict. > * Heat -- some of the older drives were pretty notorious for this. > > You can bypass a fair amount of this (at some cost in desk space & > noise) by using an external chassis for SCSI devices. But it may be > easier to deal with form factors that make in-chassis placement > problematical... and avoid overheating the SS10 proper. > > Cheers, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to > advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal > amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From jeffw@smoe.org Thu Feb 8 02:44:08 2001 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:44:08 -0500 From: Jeff Wasilko jeffw@smoe.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 Hard drive options On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:12:48PM -0500, Mule wrote: > I'm in need of a short education on the SS10 hard drive. I've been > upgrading my recently purchased Sparc 10 (although I still have no idea what > I'm going to do with it when it's 'finished') and now it's time to add some > storage. I've searched around on the web/ebay/sun and what I've seen leads > me to believe that the largest internal hard drive option is about one gig > (not much bigger than my current drive). It also looks like the hard drive > for the Sparc 4/5/20 is different from the 10, but I haven't sorted out > exactly what the difference is. I believe that any (Sun) external drive > will work fine, but what I'd really like is two 4 to 9 gig internal drives. > Is there an option to mount a drive this large internally in the SS10? You can put any size drive in as long as the heat output is within reason. You'd need a drive with a 50pin SCSI cable. The 4/5/20 use a SCA (80 pin) connector. Memoryx sells the mounting wheels you'll need for the drive: http://www.memoryx.net/3301390.html -jeff From rnovak@indyramp.com Thu Feb 8 15:33:50 2001 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:33:50 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Novak rnovak@indyramp.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 Hard drive options I thought I heard a "Mule" say: > > I'm in need of a short education on the SS10 hard drive. Most modern 3.5"HH or 3.5"x1" narrow scsi drives should work with the sled/bracket, which memoryx.net should have if you don't already have them on older drives... I have a 9GB drive in one of my systems (it's a tatung ss5 but the innards work just like the ss10 including idc50 narrow scsi) and if you can find something larger you can probably use it. I haven't seen much larger lately... I don't even see a lot of narrow scsi at all. Unfortunately there's not enough room inside to mount an SCA or wide scsi drive with an adapter, or I'd advocate that. The external case idea may be a good (and necessary) plan if you need more than 18gb on the system. Good luck. Rob -- Robert Novak, Indyramp Consulting * rnovak@indyramp.com * indyramp.com/~rnovak "And it's been a long December and there's reason to believe Maybe this year will be better than the last...." -- counting crows From jdd@cs.toronto.edu Thu Feb 8 18:25:19 2001 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:25:19 -0500 From: John DiMarco jdd@cs.toronto.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 Hard drive options In message <008501c0914a$bb107800$0971f5cd@mule>Mule writes: >I'm in need of a short education on the SS10 hard drive. I've been >upgrading my recently purchased Sparc 10 (although I still have no idea what >I'm going to do with it when it's 'finished') and now it's time to add some >storage. I've searched around on the web/ebay/sun and what I've seen leads >me to believe that the largest internal hard drive option is about one gig >(not much bigger than my current drive). It also looks like the hard drive >for the Sparc 4/5/20 is different from the 10, but I haven't sorted out >exactly what the difference is. I believe that any (Sun) external drive >will work fine, but what I'd really like is two 4 to 9 gig internal drives. >Is there an option to mount a drive this large internally in the SS10? Drives must be narrow SCSI, 3.5" form factor, up to 1.5" tall. Avoid excessively hot drives. Mounting kit is very simple: four rubber grommets attached by screws to the drive slide into mounting hardware already in the SS10. You can buy screw-on rubber feet and carve them down to the right size if you don't want to buy "official" mounting grommets. Regards, John -- John DiMarco Office: SF2101 CSLab Systems Manager Phone: 416-978-5300 University of Toronto Fax: 416-978-1931 http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jdd From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Thu Feb 8 19:56:52 2001 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:56:52 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: SS10 Hard drive options "From: rnovak@indyramp.com (Robert Novak) " "Unfortunately there's not enough room inside to mount an SCA or wide scsi "drive with an adapter, or I'd advocate that. The external case idea may be "a good (and necessary) plan if you need more than 18gb on the system. how about putting the adapter on the motherboard and making a new drive-cable harness? _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From huge@huge.org.uk Thu Feb 8 19:45:46 2001 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 19:45:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Huge huge@huge.org.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SS10 Hard drive options > From: "Mule" > will work fine, but what I'd really like is two 4 to 9 gig internal drives. > Is there an option to mount a drive this large internally in the SS10? If you're happy to wait until the weekend, I'll wrench the cover off my '10 and tell you what model of Seagate 9Gb it's got in it.... Regards, Hugh. (1+,2,LX,S10,S20,U2,U10) From Krishna_Raj@forethought.com Thu Feb 8 21:02:57 2001 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:02:57 -0500 From: Krishna_Raj@forethought.com Krishna_Raj@forethought.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] (no subject) Hello everyone: If you any of you have extra copy of Solaris 7 CDs for SPARC or any location I can dowload. Thanks for your help. Krishna From kart@hal-pc.org Fri Feb 9 08:02:03 2001 Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 02:02:03 CST From: Ted kart@hal-pc.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs I've had a very plain SS10 for about a year now (part # 501-2389-xx) which ran wonderfully until the hard drive crashed a while ago. The monitor that I used to have when I installed the machine also broke while in storage (computer was running headless). In my quest to get the sparc repaired I found the suns-at-home list. What a wonderful resource! Sorry to bombard the list with a zillion questions all at once, but getting this old machine fixed sort of requires solving several problems. [1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth prompt from a serial terminal? Will I have to find a new monitor? Any kinds of terminal to seek out or avoid? [2] Jumpering an internal fujitsu HD: The replacement drive I got is a 4 gig, 50 pin narrow SCSI drive. It has a warning sticker that says the outside of the drive must not be grounded. There are 3 clusters of jumpers on the bottom of the drive: (ascii-picture of bottom of drive, jumper pins are numbered) ----------------------------- | o o "TRM1" |50 pin connector | o o o o "SY" |on this side | o=o o o "R" | | o o "WP" | | o=o "TM" | | | | o o "ID0" | | o o "ID1 |power connector | o o "ID2" |here ----------------------------- Currently only the "TM" jumper and the 3rd one in the "TRM1" cluster are jumpered. I know only two things so far: internal drives must not have TERMPWR set (whatever that is), and that by default Sun hardware likes to boot SCSI ID3. Anyone have any idea how to jumper this drive? [3] Overheating & compatibility issues with HyperSPARC cpus: Once the machine is up and running again I plan to upgrade the memory and cpu. It currently has an SM51 that works just fine. Blindly trying to start up the machine with lots of configuration changes makes it hard to isolate problems, so right now everything is still in a known good configuration, save for the harddrive. Once (if) the fujitsu drive gets running and I find a new monitor or terminal, I've got a 125 Mhz Ross cpu and a 2.25 boot rom to drop in. a) Should I change the J401 jumper on the motherboard? It is currently set to 80Mhz. The other option is 72Mhz b) Will it get terribly hot? Is it safe to operate in a non air- conditioned 70-80 degree house? c) If it's possible to get to the console with a serial terminal (see [1]), may I remove the framebuffer to reduce heat generation inside the enclosure? Best Regards, Ted Stodgell kart@hal-pc.org http://hal-pc.org/~kart From jdd@cs.toronto.edu Thu Feb 8 21:56:52 2001 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:56:52 -0500 From: John DiMarco jdd@cs.toronto.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] (no subject) In message <052569ED.0073A0BE.00@forethought.com>you write: > If you any of you have extra copy of Solaris 7 CDs for SPARC or any >location I can dowload. Solaris 7 you'll have to buy from Sun. However, you can download Solaris 8 from www.sun.com Regards, John -- John DiMarco Office: SF2101 CSLab Systems Manager Phone: 416-978-5300 University of Toronto Fax: 416-978-1931 http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jdd From BHamill@mbcm.org Fri Feb 9 14:50:25 2001 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:50:25 -0600 From: BHamill@mbcm.org BHamill@mbcm.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ss5 memory >From: "mjevans" > >Hello everyone. I am new to this so I hope I am not asking a stupid >question. I recently purchased a ss5 and I have been told that I can use >certain dimms from Mac system. as long as it is 5v parity. is this true ? >thanks for you assistance. > I've tried this as well, and sometimes they work and sometimes they don't. Macs in the 7200,7300, 7500, 7600, 8500, 8600, 9500, 9600 series use 5V Buffered FPM DIMM memory. Sparc4 and Sparc5 can use the same, but I've had DIMMs that worked in those Macs that simply never registered with my Sparc5, and other DIMMs that worked well in both. The Sparc5 is pickier than the Mac about memory in some way that I'm sure someone else on this mailing list can explain- timing, perhaps? So, it's sort of a hit-or-miss thing. You can usually find 32MB DIMMs for the Sparc5 on eBay for around $50; for the PowerMac, they're closer to $30. When you spend the $30, you have to ask yourself, "do I feel lucky?" Barry Hamill Data Communications Administrator Memorial Blood Centers of Minnesota bhamill@mbcm.org (612) 871-3300 x2216 From harri@smilehouse.com Fri Feb 9 15:17:28 2001 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:17:28 +0200 (EET) From: Harri Haataja harri@smilehouse.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Ted wrote: > (ascii-picture of bottom of drive, jumper pins are numbered) > ----------------------------- > | o o "TRM1" |50 pin connector > | o o o o "SY" |on this side > | o=o o o "R" | > | o o "WP" | > | o=o "TM" | > | | > | o o "ID0" | > | o o "ID1 |power connector > | o o "ID2" |here > ----------------------------- > > Currently only the "TM" jumper and the 3rd one in the "TRM1" cluster > are jumpered. Usually you can get jumper sheets and all that from the makers' web site (by type number). Tried that? Anyway, I would guess: SY = Standby? Slow start perhaps. TM = Terminated (TE or TD in many drives, term ena/disa) > I know only two things so far: internal drives must not have TERMPWR I think the TRM1 is the term power and has states like: *No power *Power from bus *Power from drive power connector. Which is which, beats me. > set (whatever that is), and that by default Sun hardware likes to > boot SCSI ID3. Yes, and then there's the issue of id mapping.. The id scheme looks normal: = ID0*2^0 + ID1*2^1 + ID2*2^2 Like access modes. So id 3 would be ID0 and ID1 closed, ID2 open (1*1+1*2+0*4) for example. -- /* [...] Note that 120 sec is defined in the protocol as the maximum * * possible RTT. I guess we'll have to use something other than TCP * * to talk to the University of Mars. */ From nico@gartengold.de Fri Feb 9 15:17:34 2001 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:17:34 +0100 From: Nico Goldschmidt nico@gartengold.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs Hi Ted! > [1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth > prompt from a serial terminal? Will I have to find a new monitor? Any > kinds of terminal to seek out or avoid? Almost every serial terminal (or terminal emulation on another machine with a null-modem-cable) should work; the OBP will switch input and output to the terminal if no keyboard is attached. > [2] Jumpering an internal fujitsu HD: The replacement drive I got is > a 4 gig, 50 pin narrow SCSI drive. It has a warning sticker that says > the outside of the drive must not be grounded. There are 3 clusters > of jumpers on the bottom of the drive: > > (ascii-picture of bottom of drive, jumper pins are numbered) > ----------------------------- > | o o "TRM1" |50 pin connector > | o o o o "SY" |on this side > | o=o o o "R" | > | o o "WP" | > | o=o "TM" | > | | > | o o "ID0" | > | o o "ID1 |power connector > | o o "ID2" |here > ----------------------------- > > Currently only the "TM" jumper and the 3rd one in the "TRM1" cluster > are jumpered. > > I know only two things so far: internal drives must not have TERMPWR > set (whatever that is), and that by default Sun hardware likes to boot > SCSI ID3. > > Anyone have any idea how to jumper this drive? The first drive should be installed next to the floppy with ID3, so you have to set the jumpers ID0 and ID1. > [3] Overheating & compatibility issues with HyperSPARC cpus: Once the > machine is up and running again I plan to upgrade the memory and cpu. > It currently has an SM51 that works just fine. Blindly trying to > start up the machine with lots of configuration changes makes it hard > to isolate problems, so right now everything is still in a known good > configuration, save for the harddrive. > > Once (if) the fujitsu drive gets running and I find a new monitor or > terminal, I've got a 125 Mhz Ross cpu and a 2.25 boot rom to drop in. > a) Should I change the J401 jumper on the motherboard? > It is currently set to 80Mhz. The other option is 72Mhz It should be truely Plug-and-Play: drop in the BootROM and the CPU (leaving the jumper at 80MHz, the module generates its own clock) and do a boot -r. > > b) Will it get terribly hot? Is it safe to operate in a non air- > conditioned 70-80 degree house? Don't worry about thermal problems with a single HyperSPARC 125. > c) If it's possible to get to the console with a serial terminal > (see [1]), may I remove the framebuffer to reduce heat generation > inside the enclosure? Don't worry about framebuffer heat, unless you have a ZX. For further information have a look at the Service Manual at: http://docs.sun.com:80/ab2/coll.208.1/SMSS10/@Ab2TocView?Ab 2Lang=de&Ab2Enc=iso-8859-1 Regards, Nico From Jan@Bytesmiths.com Fri Feb 9 18:38:15 2001 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:38:15 -0800 From: Jan Steinman Jan@Bytesmiths.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: more 4MB SIMMs I've got 16 of these on eBay right now for $1, but no takers after four days. And then I see folks on this list giving them away! So if no one bids on them, they'll be free for shipping to the first taker(s). Here's a photo: This is NOT a solicitation to bid -- really! But if you get them for the shipping, I'm not going to take a credit card. :-) I've also got misc SS2 parts and a Cycle 5 SS4 clone board with bad SCSI, two 16MB SS5 SIMMs, and a bootable-modified Toshiba CD-ROM drive. Any offers welcome, or trade for SS20 RAM, ethernet card, whatever... -- : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Fri Feb 9 17:18:42 2001 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:18:42 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs "From: "Ted" " "I've had a very plain SS10 for about a year now (part # 501-2389-xx) "which ran wonderfully until the hard drive crashed a while ago. "The monitor that I used to have when I installed the machine "also broke while in storage (computer was running headless). " "In my quest to get the sparc repaired I found the suns-at-home list. "What a wonderful resource! Sorry to bombard the list with a zillion "questions all at once, but getting this old machine fixed sort of "requires solving several problems. " "[1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth "prompt from a serial terminal? Will I have to find a new monitor? "Any kinds of terminal to seek out or avoid? easily -- ttya will be used as the console if you boot without the kybd. rs232 break replaces stop-a to halt the machine. "[2] Jumpering an internal fujitsu HD: The replacement drive I got is "a 4 gig, 50 pin narrow SCSI drive. It has a warning sticker that "says the outside of the drive must not be grounded. There are 3 "clusters of jumpers on the bottom of the drive: " "(ascii-picture of bottom of drive, jumper pins are numbered) "----------------------------- "| o o "TRM1" |50 pin connector "| o o o o "SY" |on this side "| o=o o o "R" | "| o o "WP" | "| o=o "TM" | "| | "| o o "ID0" | "| o o "ID1 |power connector "| o o "ID2" |here "----------------------------- " "Currently only the "TM" jumper and the 3rd one in the "TRM1" cluster "are jumpered. " "I know only two things so far: internal drives must not have TERMPWR scsi bus termination power; they're too close to the controller. "set (whatever that is), and that by default Sun hardware likes to "boot SCSI ID3. this is just a convention; you can easily set the obp to boot disk1... "Anyone have any idea how to jumper this drive? have you checked the fujitsu website? i know seagate keeps jumper layouts for - afaik - all the drives they've ever made. id0/1/2 must be the scsi id... "[3] Overheating & compatibility issues with HyperSPARC cpus: Once the "machine is up and running again I plan to upgrade the memory and cpu. "It currently has an SM51 that works just fine. Blindly trying to start "up the machine with lots of configuration changes makes it hard to "isolate problems, so right now everything is still in a known good "configuration, save for the harddrive. " "Once (if) the fujitsu drive gets running and I find a new monitor or "terminal, I've got a 125 Mhz Ross cpu and a 2.25 boot rom to drop in. " a) Should I change the J401 jumper on the motherboard? " It is currently set to 80Mhz. The other option is 72Mhz no. this was for -early- ss10s with 36MHz cpus. " b) Will it get terribly hot? Is it safe to operate in a non air- " conditioned 70-80 degree house? i think you'll be safe. 80 isn't a very warm ambient. " c) If it's possible to get to the console with a serial terminal " (see [1]), may I remove the framebuffer to reduce heat generation " inside the enclosure? this is standard practice for sun servers, in fact the biggest real difference. be sure to block the hole in the panel. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From huge@huge.org.uk Fri Feb 9 19:18:33 2001 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 19:18:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Huge huge@huge.org.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs > From: "Ted" > [1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth > prompt from a serial terminal? Boot the box with the Sun keyboard unplugged. Serial port A becomes the console - it's 9600,N,1 IIRC. H. From tikeda@sprintmail.com Sat Feb 10 01:49:38 2001 Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 20:49:38 -0500 From: Tim Ikeda tikeda@sprintmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] IPX - Onboard video problem I've got an IPX from which I can't seem to get a video signal out of the onboard video port. Conditions: IPX, ROM v2.4, 48MB RAM. ~400MB HD (working) Keyboard and mouse attached & known to be working. Multisync PC monitor attached through adapter. This monitor works with a TGX card in the IPX and with a GX card in a SS10. However, if I install a TGX card, I can get perfectly good video and watch the machine boot. It does detect two cg6's under that condition (Still, no video from the GX port). As far as I can tell, the system is set to direct output to video (not ttya). I've also tried resetting the NVRAM to default settings but still nothing from onboard video (w/ or w/o the TGX card). I've done some searching on this problem but haven't seen a solution. Is there something obvious that I'm overlooking in the hardware settings? My monitor is not detecting any signal, but I suppose I could check the voltages at the connector pins to confirm. Thanks, Tim Ikeda (tikeda@sprintmail.com) From marke@home.com Sun Feb 11 00:36:35 2001 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 16:36:35 -0800 From: Mark Edelman marke@home.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] IPX Systems forsale I have three IPX systems and other misc Sun pieces that I want to sell as part of a garage cleanout. The three systems are: System #1: IPX w/Weitek PowerUP (original CPU too) 64MB, 4.3GB second ethernet card Type 5 keyboard, mechanical mouse external 4-bay SCSI chassis (Sun CDROM, & 4.3GB HD) Solaris 2.6 installed cables (power, serial, audio, SCSI ...) System #2: IPX w/Weitek PowerUP (original CPU too) 64MB, 400MB second ethernet card Type 5 keyboard, optical mouse & pad external 4-bay SCSI tower (Toshiba CDROM, 4.3GB HD & 1/4" tape) Solaris 2.5.1 installed cables (power, serial, audio, SCSI ...) System #3: IPX unknown memory (I think it's 48MB), 400MB drive Solaris 2.5.1 (I think ...) (this was my wife's machine, so I don't know the details) Other misc pieces: 2 Sun GDM-1662B monitors The monitors are heavy, so they are probably not worth shipping. I am looking for best offers, buyer pays any shipping. I am willing to deliver in the South Bay area. -- Mark Edelman Mission Creek Systems, Inc. phone: (510)770-8664 42668 Lerwick Street fax: (510)770-8664 Fremont, CA 94539 mailto:marke@mission-creek.com http://www.mission-creek.com mailto:marke@home.com From billj@ieee.org Sun Feb 11 19:43:29 2001 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:43:29 -0800 From: Bill Janssen billj@ieee.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ? on Found FDDI card Picked up this Sbus FDDI card and know nothing about it. Anyone recognize This card? It's marked model C301T and the Optical interface module is marked AT&T ODL FDDI. On the front it has the rectangular optical plug (duplex) and two lamps marked status and ringop. Two questions; is it for multi mode ( I have 500 feet of cable) is it worth saving or selling. I am sure that I won't use it as I have coax for my local net. Thanks Bill K7NOM From firebug@apk.net Sun Feb 11 17:40:46 2001 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:40:46 -0500 From: Derrik Walker v2.0 firebug@apk.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Anyone using Suns for Ham Radio? I know Linux is big in the packet radio world, but what about Solaris? Are there tools for Packet, ARQ, and SWL applications like RTTY, RFax, and Morris code encoders/decoders? What about software control of Radios? Just wandering before I consider reinventing the wheel. thanks -Derrik mailto:firebug@apk.net http://junior.apk.net/~firebug ------------------------------ Established technology tends to persist in the face of new technology. -- G. Blaauw, one of the designers of System 360 From bt@insiders-fs.com Mon Feb 12 09:21:15 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:21:15 +0100 From: Volker Borchert bt@insiders-fs.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: SS10 Hard drive options In message <200102081956.OAA21552@an.bradford.ma.us> you write: |> "From: rnovak@indyramp.com (Robert Novak) |> " |> "Unfortunately there's not enough room inside to mount an SCA or wide scsi |> "drive with an adapter, or I'd advocate that. The external case idea may be |> "a good (and necessary) plan if you need more than 18gb on the system. |> |> how about putting the adapter on the motherboard and making a new |> drive-cable harness? The IBM DNES 18 GB drive was made in a narrow ultra version. With a little luck, you might be able to find some of these. Volker From kart@hal-pc.org Mon Feb 12 05:29:09 2001 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:29:09 CST From: Ted kart@hal-pc.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs huge@huge.org.uk said: >> [1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth >> prompt from a serial terminal? > >Boot the box with the Sun keyboard unplugged. Serial port A becomes >the console - it's 9600,N,1 IIRC Thanks. I tried with those settings but it's not working yet. It might be the cable or the terminal emulator software I'm using. Worse case scenario is the box is completely dead, but it seems to be working ok. I just need to find a _real_ serial terminal or a Sun monitor. As far as I can tell by looking at pinout diagrams, a regular DB25-DB9 null modem cable should work. The motherboard is jumpered to the default RS432 mode. My DB25 mini-tester gadget shows the TD, RTS and DTR pins are active voltage when the sparc boots, but nothing ever appears in my terminal emulators. Anyone in the Houston, Texas area happen to have a spare terminal? -- Ted Stodgell kart@hal-pc.org From mpotter@atpco.com Mon Feb 12 02:51:40 2001 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:51:40 -0500 From: Matthew Potter mpotter@atpco.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Anyone using Suns for Ham Radio? There is a soundmodem driver & software for solaris... never used it though... I dont know how good it or the sun sound card is. http://www.ife.ee.ethz.ch/~sailer/ham/soundmodem/ KG4JZH At 12:40 PM 2/11/01 -0500, Derrik Walker v2.0 wrote: >I know Linux is big in the packet radio world, but what about Solaris? Are >there tools for Packet, ARQ, and SWL applications like RTTY, RFax, and >Morris code encoders/decoders? What about software control of Radios? > >Just wandering before I consider reinventing the wheel. > >thanks > > -Derrik > >mailto:firebug@apk.net >http://junior.apk.net/~firebug >------------------------------ >Established technology tends to persist in the face of new technology. > -- G. Blaauw, one of the designers of System 360 > > >_______________________________________________ >Suns-at-Home mailing list >Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com >http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > > From huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Mon Feb 12 13:21:26 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:21:26 +0000 (GMT) From: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Anyone using Suns for Ham Radio? AFAIK, there are some Solaris AX25 drivers, but they're way old. I have a copy I can make available of you wish. Apart from that, there doesn't seem to be a whole lot -that fits right in with the Luddite attitudes of many amateurs, present compnay excepted, of course. Regards, hugh. (G0CNR, although inactive for years.) -- "The road to Paradise is through Intercourse." The uk.transport FAQ; http://www.huge.org.uk/transport/FAQ.html [Delete "nospam." to email me] On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Derrik Walker v2.0 wrote: > I know Linux is big in the packet radio world, but what about Solaris? Are > there tools for Packet, ARQ, and SWL applications like RTTY, RFax, and > Morris code encoders/decoders? What about software control of Radios? > > Just wandering before I consider reinventing the wheel. > > thanks > > -Derrik > > mailto:firebug@apk.net > http://junior.apk.net/~firebug > ------------------------------ > Established technology tends to persist in the face of new technology. > -- G. Blaauw, one of the designers of System 360 > > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Mon Feb 12 16:45:50 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:45:50 +0000 (GMT) From: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Ted wrote: > huge@huge.org.uk said: > >> [1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth > >> prompt from a serial terminal? > > > >Boot the box with the Sun keyboard unplugged. Serial port A becomes > >the console - it's 9600,N,1 IIRC > > Thanks. I tried with those settings but it's not working yet. It might > be the cable or the terminal emulator software I'm using. Worse case > scenario is the box is completely dead, but it seems to be working ok. > I just need to find a _real_ serial terminal or a Sun monitor. > > As far as I can tell by looking at pinout diagrams, a regular DB25-DB9 > null modem cable should work. It seems to be very unpicky about what you plug in. I've used assorted laptops, assorted desktops and most recently a Psion 5MX. One thing that occurs is to make sure the serial ports are enabled in the OBP; ttyb-rts-dtr-off=false ttyb-ignore-cd=true ttya-rts-dtr-off=false ttya-ignore-cd=true ttyb-mode=9600,8,n,1,- ttya-mode=9600,8,n,1,- Regards, Hugh. From Jan@Bytesmiths.com Mon Feb 12 18:53:20 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:53:20 -0800 From: Jan Steinman Jan@Bytesmiths.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] WTB: SS20 RAM I've got 48MB in my SS20, which has actually been fairly comfortable. I just got Solaris 8 in the mail, and it wants 64MB just to install! Anyone have any SS20 RAM sitting around gathering dust? I'd rather pay a list member a fair price than go do the eBay thing... Thanks in advance! -- : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 From Jan@Bytesmiths.com Mon Feb 12 19:11:00 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:11:00 -0800 From: Jan Steinman Jan@Bytesmiths.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] networked Postscript printer woes ...the saga of moving from my SS5 clone backup tapes to a SS20 continues... I used the admintool to set up a networked Postscript printer (HP 8500), but it doesn't print anything except the banner page. I can pipe plain text through postprint(1) and get ugly monospaced output, but I can't seem to get anything out of a troff | dpost pipeline. (Of course, man -t doesn't work either, which is my primary need right at the moment...) dpost dies, complaining about bad input. I've poured over the various lpsystem man pages. They mention attaching interfaces, but there aren't any in the referenced folder. The HP web site only supports Windoze and Mac. Any insight or help appreciated! -- : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 From Jan@Bytesmiths.com Mon Feb 12 19:01:55 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:01:55 -0800 From: Jan Steinman Jan@Bytesmiths.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] in.named pain and suffering I've just salvaged the last files from my dead SS5 clone onto a SS20. Unfortunately, my carefully configured DNS server doesn't want to run. I previously downloaded, compiled, and installed named myself, and it used a file called /etc/named.boot. Now in.named appears to be a part of Solaris, and it has a totally different start-up file (/etc/named.conf) and format. (The database files seem to be unchanged, thank goodness.) Before I go crawling through the (overly complex) man page, does anyone have a script to translate old named.boot files to named.conf format? I originally set it up using the Nutshell DNS/bind book, which seems to be older than the new named.conf format. -- : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 From zu22@andrew.cmu.edu Mon Feb 12 17:21:38 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:21:38 -0500 (EST) From: Zachary Uram zu22@andrew.cmu.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal i am not sure what type handshake I should use "software/hardware" and what "flow control" DTS etc..? On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk wrote: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Ted wrote: > > > huge@huge.org.uk said: > > >> [1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth > > >> prompt from a serial terminal? > > > > > >Boot the box with the Sun keyboard unplugged. Serial port A becomes > > >the console - it's 9600,N,1 IIRC > > > > Thanks. I tried with those settings but it's not working yet. It might > > be the cable or the terminal emulator software I'm using. Worse case > > scenario is the box is completely dead, but it seems to be working ok. > > I just need to find a _real_ serial terminal or a Sun monitor. > > > > As far as I can tell by looking at pinout diagrams, a regular DB25-DB9 > > null modem cable should work. > > It seems to be very unpicky about what you plug in. I've used assorted > laptops, assorted desktops and most recently a Psion 5MX. One thing that > occurs is to make sure the serial ports are enabled in the OBP; > > ttyb-rts-dtr-off=false > ttyb-ignore-cd=true > ttya-rts-dtr-off=false > ttya-ignore-cd=true > ttyb-mode=9600,8,n,1,- > ttya-mode=9600,8,n,1,- > > Regards, > > Hugh. > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > uram@cmu.edu "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have faith." - John 20:29 From paul@anastrophe.com Mon Feb 12 21:45:51 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:45:51 GMT From: paul@anastrophe.com paul@anastrophe.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: in.named pain and suffering What version are you running? Anything less than the recently released 8.2.3-REL is several reported security vulnerabilities. there is a perl script included with all recent versions that will convert your named.boot to a named.conf file. i have the docs for both 8.2.3-REL and 9.1.0 up on my website -- the next to last link on the main page at http://www.anastrophe.com Jan Steinman writes: > I've just salvaged the last files from my dead SS5 clone onto a SS20. > > Unfortunately, my carefully configured DNS server doesn't want to run. > > I previously downloaded, compiled, and installed named myself, and it used > a file called /etc/named.boot. Now in.named appears to be a part of > Solaris, and it has a totally different start-up file (/etc/named.conf) > and format. (The database files seem to be unchanged, thank goodness.) > > Before I go crawling through the (overly complex) man page, does anyone > have a script to translate old named.boot files to named.conf format? > > I originally set it up using the Nutshell DNS/bind book, which seems to be > older than the new named.conf format. > > -- > : Jan Steinman > : Bytesmiths > : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home --------------------------------- Paul Theodoropoulos paul@anastrophe.net Senior Unix Systems Administrator Syntactically Subversive Services, Inc. http://www.anastrophe.net Downtime Is Not An Option From BehmJL@bvsg.com Mon Feb 12 22:56:58 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:56:58 -0600 From: Behm, Jeffrey L. BehmJL@bvsg.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] in.named pain and suffering >From http://www.nominum.com/resources/faqs/bind-faq.html If you are converting from BIND 4, you will need to convert the configuration file named.boot to the new syntax. A conversion program is included. named-bootconf < /etc/named.boot > /etc/named.conf YMMV Jeff >From: Jan Steinman [mailto:Jan@Bytesmiths.com] >I previously downloaded, compiled, and installed named myself, and it >used a file called /etc/named.boot. Now in.named appears to be a part >of Solaris, and it has a totally different start-up file >(/etc/named.conf) and format. (The database files seem to be >unchanged, thank goodness.) > >Before I go crawling through the (overly complex) man page, does >anyone have a script to translate old named.boot files to named.conf >format? From sparcy@proxy.goblin.cx Tue Feb 13 12:34:35 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:34:35 +0100 (CET) From: sparcy sparcy@proxy.goblin.cx Subject: [Suns-at-Home] saying goodbye to my suns ... sniff Due to seriously running out of space I'm selling all my Sun stuff - *PLEASE NOTE* I'm in Europe (the Netherlands) so if you want to ship it to the states it will be pricy! (the server and storage array are *heavy*) - If you are in the Netherlands (or nearby) you can see the system up and running. Quicklist: 1 SparcServer 1000, 1 Sparc Storage Array, 2 SS2's, 1 SS20, 21" Sun monitor and a whole lotta extra stuff. I guess a fair price for the whole lot is something like $3000 - if you are a student or a true Sun freak we can negotiate on the price. I've put some pictures up of the system on: http://www.geocities.com/jack5382000/pix/ SparcServer1000: 4 cpu's (max 8), 256Mb (max 2G), 8 scsi harddisks, 2 scsi cdrom's, 1 external scsi cdrom, 1 external scsi harddisk, 2x10Mb utp, 1x100Mb fiber utp, 1 fiber link for StorageArray, 3 scsi busses, etc. SparcStorageArray: 3 trays, max 30 scsi harddisken, now contains 10. Fiber link + cabel for server connection. SS20: 2 cpu's (dual cpu), 128Mb,1Gig scsi harddisk, additional thru video port, external scsi, etc. 2xSS2: both 32Mb, Scsi harddisk. Extra's: Type 4 and 5 keyboards, many kabels (scsi, utp, etc), type 4 and 5 (optical) mice, original Sun microphone. All systems with original parts (brackets, fans, etc). All in excellent shape - SparcSercver has some minor cosmetic damage on backside. Original 21-Inch Sun monitor included. Linux 6.2 is installed on all, on server also SunOS 5.6 (dual boot), you get additional cd's containing Linux, BSD, etc. If you are interested please email me directly on my account that I read daily: flux@nebule.com Cheers, Sparcy. From airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Tue Feb 13 05:14:07 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:14:07 -0600 (CST) From: Dan Debertin airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 'ps' on diskless workstation I have a much-loved ELC that boots & mounts its root filesystem off of a FreeBSD box (long story; I can expand on how I did this if anyone's curious). The only problem that I can see is that 'ps' returns no output: $ ps -ef UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD $ Here's a clue: any effort to truss a command results in this output: $ truss ls truss: /proc is not a PROC directory $ So I guess I have a /proc problem. /proc appears to be mounted, AFAIK, but something isn't right. Anybody seen this before? Thanks, Dan Debertin airboss@bitstream.net From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Tue Feb 13 00:38:31 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:38:31 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: in.named pain and suffering "From: Jan Steinman " "Before I go crawling through the (overly complex) man page, does "anyone have a script to translate old named.boot files to named.conf "format? no, but i - rummaging around stokely.com i think - found a script that sets your system up to be a cacheing dns server, and it handles both bind 4 [old] and bind 8 [new] style configs. it didn't properly detect that my old 2.5 system was bind 4 though. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Tue Feb 13 00:34:42 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:34:42 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals "From: Zachary Uram " "i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal "i am not sure what type handshake I should use ""software/hardware" and what "flow control" DTS etc..? i believe it should be hardware, rts/cts. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Mon Feb 12 23:33:57 2001 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:33:57 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: IPX - Onboard video problem "From: Tim Ikeda " "I've got an IPX from which I can't seem to get a video signal "out of the onboard video port. just thinking out loud -- the chip could be okay but the video drivers are blown. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From mjm@wru.org Tue Feb 13 13:46:33 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:46:33 -0600 From: mjm@wru.org mjm@wru.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 'ps' on diskless workstation your /etc/vfstab should have something like: /proc - /proc proc - no - in it... does it? On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:14:07PM -0600, Dan Debertin wrote: > I have a much-loved ELC that boots & mounts its root filesystem off of a > FreeBSD box (long story; I can expand on how I did this if anyone's > curious). The only problem that I can see is that 'ps' returns no output: > > $ ps -ef > UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD > $ > > Here's a clue: any effort to truss a command results in this output: > > $ truss ls > truss: /proc is not a PROC directory > $ > > So I guess I have a /proc problem. /proc appears to be mounted, AFAIK, but > something isn't right. Anybody seen this before? > > Thanks, > > Dan Debertin > airboss@bitstream.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home -- Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. - George Washington From mjm@wru.org Tue Feb 13 13:43:41 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:43:41 -0600 From: mjm@wru.org mjm@wru.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals um, nope...rs/6000s, yes, suns, no, On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:34:42PM -0500, Sandwich Maker wrote: > "From: Zachary Uram > " > "i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal > "i am not sure what type handshake I should use > ""software/hardware" and what "flow control" DTS etc..? > > i believe it should be hardware, rts/cts. From harri@smilehouse.com Tue Feb 13 13:14:07 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:14:07 +0200 (EET) From: Harri Haataja harri@smilehouse.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 'ps' on diskless workstation On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Dan Debertin wrote: > I have a much-loved ELC that boots & mounts its root filesystem off of a > FreeBSD box (long story; I can expand on how I did this if anyone's > curious). The only problem that I can see is that 'ps' returns no output: > $ truss ls > truss: /proc is not a PROC directory > $ > > So I guess I have a /proc problem. /proc appears to be mounted, AFAIK, but > something isn't right. Anybody seen this before? Is /proc really the proc file system (ls and cat around)? -- /* [...] Note that 120 sec is defined in the protocol as the maximum * * possible RTT. I guess we'll have to use something other than TCP * * to talk to the University of Mars. */ From William.Salmon@cna.com Tue Feb 13 15:04:55 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:04:55 -0600 From: Salmon,William E.,Wes William.Salmon@cna.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] IPX - Onboard video problem I see this all the time. The sparc classic won't work, but the LX will. Same thing. It's the monitor. The IPX video (cg3?) doesn't work, but the TGX cards will. I think it has to do with frequency, as I have found if you hook up a sun monitor, everything works. My favorite solution for all this mess is to buy a Raritan Sun to PS/2 adapter (about $120) that converts Sun 13w3 video, Sun keyboard/mouse to PC PS/2 keyboard and VGA video connector. This solution works with any monitor/video combination. Wes -----Original Message----- From: Tim Ikeda [mailto:tikeda@sprintmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 7:50 PM To: suns-at-home@net-kitchen.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] IPX - Onboard video problem I've got an IPX from which I can't seem to get a video signal out of the onboard video port. Conditions: IPX, ROM v2.4, 48MB RAM. ~400MB HD (working) Keyboard and mouse attached & known to be working. Multisync PC monitor attached through adapter. This monitor works with a TGX card in the IPX and with a GX card in a SS10. However, if I install a TGX card, I can get perfectly good video and watch the machine boot. It does detect two cg6's under that condition (Still, no video from the GX port). As far as I can tell, the system is set to direct output to video (not ttya). I've also tried resetting the NVRAM to default settings but still nothing from onboard video (w/ or w/o the TGX card). I've done some searching on this problem but haven't seen a solution. Is there something obvious that I'm overlooking in the hardware settings? My monitor is not detecting any signal, but I suppose I could check the voltages at the connector pins to confirm. Thanks, Tim Ikeda (tikeda@sprintmail.com) From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Tue Feb 13 15:11:16 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:11:16 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals "From: mjm@wru.org " "um, nope...rs/6000s, yes, suns, no, " "On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:34:42PM -0500, Sandwich Maker wrote: "> "From: Zachary Uram "> " "> "i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal "> "i am not sure what type handshake I should use "> ""software/hardware" and what "flow control" DTS etc..? "> "> i believe it should be hardware, rts/cts. i remember messing around with eeprom and getty variables and getting this to work, but it was six years and as many contracts ago... _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From aad@talltree.net Tue Feb 13 17:28:11 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:28:11 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony A. D. Talltree aad@talltree.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals > "i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal Wow. You have a Wyse50 that hasn't burned itself up yet? Miserable terminals, those. "> "i am not sure what type handshake I should use "> ""software/hardware" and what "flow control" DTS etc..? I suggest that you disable flow control entirely and go from there. Check out the following: http://www.stokely.com/unix.serial.port.resources/modem.html Although there is a fair amount of idiocy there -- eg. actually using 'tip' -- you should be able to find what you need. From zu22@andrew.cmu.edu Tue Feb 13 17:03:30 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:03:30 -0500 (EST) From: Zachary Uram zu22@andrew.cmu.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals so what should i use? On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 mjm@wru.org wrote: > um, nope...rs/6000s, yes, suns, no, > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:34:42PM -0500, Sandwich Maker wrote: > > "From: Zachary Uram > > " > > "i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal > > "i am not sure what type handshake I should use > > ""software/hardware" and what "flow control" DTS etc..? > > > > i believe it should be hardware, rts/cts. > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > uram@cmu.edu "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have faith." - John 20:29 From mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Tue Feb 13 16:58:07 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:58:07 -0500 (EST) From: der Mouse mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals >>> i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal i am not sure >>> what type handshake I should use "software/hardware" and what >>> "flow control" DTS etc..? >> i believe it should be hardware, rts/cts. > um, nope...rs/6000s, yes, suns, no, I don't know about the rs6k, but wrt Suns, this matches my experience: I normally use no hardware handshaking at all (my cables usually connect just txd, rxd, and any grounds). Software handshaking, well, DC1/DC3 usually works once an OS is up. I haven't needed to worry about it, for the most part, since the devices I hang on Sun serial console ports are generally capable of taking 9600 without having to flow-control it down. der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From negativl@best.com Tue Feb 13 16:31:29 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:31:29 -0800 (PST) From: Raymond Wong negativl@best.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 'ps' on diskless workstation Dan Debertin wrote: > truss: /proc is not a PROC directory > $ > > So I guess I have a /proc problem. /proc appears to be mounted, AFAIK, but > something isn't right. Anybody seen this before? You're not trying to NFS mount /proc from the disk server, are you? It's not a real filesystem, so your client should still mount it locally in its /etc/vfstab (/proc - proc somethingsomething). You DID give the client root-write perms on whichever fs it's getting for /, right? Ray Wong PO BOX 6163 negativl at best.com, negativl at netcom.com Hayward, CA 94540-6163 Member #11537, Deborah Gibson International Fan Club Co-Founder and Charter Member, Sutton Foster International Fan Club From mjm@wru.org Tue Feb 13 20:14:23 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:14:23 -0600 From: mjm@wru.org mjm@wru.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals 9600, 8-n-1, software (if any) flow control. *NOT* hardware flow control. On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:03:30PM -0500, Zachary Uram wrote: > so what should i use? > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 mjm@wru.org wrote: > > > um, nope...rs/6000s, yes, suns, no, > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:34:42PM -0500, Sandwich Maker wrote: > > > "From: Zachary Uram > > > " > > > "i have problem with connecting my Wyse50 terminal > > > "i am not sure what type handshake I should use > > > ""software/hardware" and what "flow control" DTS etc..? > > > > > > i believe it should be hardware, rts/cts. > > _______________________________________________ > > Suns-at-Home mailing list > > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > > > > > uram@cmu.edu > "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have faith." - John 20:29 > -- Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. - George Washington From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Tue Feb 13 22:25:36 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:25:36 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals "From: mjm@wru.org " "9600, 8-n-1, software (if any) flow control. *NOT* hardware flow control. " "On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:03:30PM -0500, Zachary Uram wrote: "> so what should i use? i agree - initially, at least. i went on to hardware flow control -after- i got the system and console playing together. one of my reasons was to go to 38400 baud; on sunos4 i was rewarded with significantly faster boots. quite a surprise to find the obp was spending so much time jabbering at the screen... _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From kart@hal-pc.org Wed Feb 14 01:03:55 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:03:55 CST From: Ted kart@hal-pc.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs bonomi@bonomi.com(robert bonomi) said: > stick a null-modem in. that fixes 95% or more of -all- serial comm > "dont work" problems. seriously Assuming you meant a null modem *cable*, that's exactly what I have been using. I can't think of any other kind of cable that would be even remotely appropriate. Thanks for the tip, though ;) -- Ted Stodgell kart@hal-pc.org From kart@hal-pc.org Wed Feb 14 01:10:35 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:10:35 CST From: Ted kart@hal-pc.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk said: > One thing that occurs is to make sure the serial ports > are enabled in the OBP; > >ttyb-rts-dtr-off=false >ttyb-ignore-cd=true >ttya-rts-dtr-off=false >ttya-ignore-cd=true >ttyb-mode=9600,8,n,1,- >ttya-mode=9600,8,n,1,- How do I make changes to the OBP when I can't get to the OBP? I need to get either a Sun monitor or some kind of serial terminal setup in order to get to the OBP in the first place. -- Ted Stodgell kart@hal-pc.org From jeffw@smoe.org Wed Feb 14 02:27:05 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:27:05 -0500 From: Jeff Wasilko jeffw@smoe.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 07:10:35PM -0600, Ted wrote: > huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk said: > > One thing that occurs is to make sure the serial ports > > are enabled in the OBP; > > > >ttyb-rts-dtr-off=false > >ttyb-ignore-cd=true > >ttya-rts-dtr-off=false > >ttya-ignore-cd=true > >ttyb-mode=9600,8,n,1,- > >ttya-mode=9600,8,n,1,- > > How do I make changes to the OBP when I can't get to the OBP? > > I need to get either a Sun monitor or some kind of serial terminal > setup in order to get to the OBP in the first place. You can change the eeprom while unix is running using the 'eeprom' command. So, if you can telnet in, you can change the OBP. jeff From kart@hal-pc.org Wed Feb 14 02:41:58 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:41:58 CST From: Ted kart@hal-pc.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs Jeff Wasilko says: > You can change the eeprom while unix is running using the > 'eeprom' command. So, if you can telnet in, you can change the > OBP. The machine will power up but it never shows up on the network, so I have no idea if ever completes booting. Unix was set to grab just any old ip via dhcp and start sshd. Back before the monitor died, It Used To Work Just Fine(tm) The last time it booted I had to manually tell it what device to boot while in the OBP, so I'm assuming it gets to the OBP and just sits there, but without any kind of display there's no way to tell what's going on. I have "null-modem" cable that's DB25 on one end and DB9 on the other. It may or may not have the correct pinout to work, but I could always rip it apart and reconnect it so it's wired correctly. I figured that just any null modem cable would work :P The case may be that OBP settings need to be changed in order to even *see* the OBP. Is the situation hopeless? Do I just need to keep hunting for a Sun monitor? Thanks again for the help. -- Ted Stodgell kart@hal-pc.org From schiller@agrijag.com Wed Feb 14 03:14:19 2001 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:14:19 -0500 From: Michael Schiller schiller@agrijag.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SES/B Sbus expansion VME card Hi everyone! I have an SS690MP (in my kitchen!) that has the 520 & 521 mbus cards in them, So I only have 2 sbus slots! :( Does anyone out there have a 501-1955 (SBus Expansion Subsystem SES/B) that they'd want to sell? I don't want to pay a whole lot for it, as this is a hobby for me, and I really don't want to use the external xbox expansion either. But, what good is a server in the kitchen with only 2 sbus slots ! Thanks. -Mike -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PGP fingerprint= D2 4F A8 B7 13 D5 73 1E 48 99 40 99 F9 BC 74 74 Email: schiller@agrijag.com Web: http://www.agrijag.com Voice: 423-625-6349 FAX: 423-623-9054 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From jeffw@smoe.org Wed Feb 14 15:22:41 2001 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:22:41 -0500 From: Jeff Wasilko jeffw@smoe.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:41:58PM -0600, Ted wrote: > Jeff Wasilko says: > > You can change the eeprom while unix is running using the > > 'eeprom' command. So, if you can telnet in, you can change the > > OBP. > > The machine will power up but it never shows up on the network, > so I have no idea if ever completes booting. Unix was set to > grab just any old ip via dhcp and start sshd. Back before the > monitor died, It Used To Work Just Fine(tm) > > The last time it booted I had to manually tell it what device to boot > while in the OBP, so I'm assuming it gets to the OBP and just sits > there, but without any kind of display there's no way to tell what's > going on. > > I have "null-modem" cable that's DB25 on one end and DB9 on the other. > It may or may not have the correct pinout to work, but I could always > rip it apart and reconnect it so it's wired correctly. I figured > that just any null modem cable would work :P > > The case may be that OBP settings need to be changed in order to > even *see* the OBP. Is the situation hopeless? Do I just need to > keep hunting for a Sun monitor? If you have a sun keyboard, you can reset the NVRAM to factory defaults by holding down stop-N while the system powers up. See http://aa11.cjb.net/sun_managers/1998/12/msg00223.html for more info. You do know that the keyboard has to be unplugged for I/O to default to console, right? -jeff From kart@hal-pc.org Wed Feb 14 20:59:27 2001 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:59:27 GMT From: kart@hal-pc.org kart@hal-pc.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs Jeff Wasilko wrote: > If you have a sun keyboard, you can reset the NVRAM to factory > defaults by holding down stop-N while the system powers up. Excellent. I'll be sure to try that this evening. And yes, I did know that the keyboard has to be unplugged for I/o to default to console. The likely scenario is that the current OBP settings are non-default and it's making communications over the null-modem cable impossible. Alternatively, there's another fellow I work with who picked up my sparc's twin sibling at our company's surplus sale last year. His monitor probably still works, or he might even be willing to sell the whole system. -- Ted Stodgell kart@hal-pc.org From billj@ieee.org Wed Feb 14 22:51:45 2001 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:51:45 -0800 From: Bill Janssen billj@ieee.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ? VME SCSI card I brought home two VME cards that I think are SCSI interface cards. The part number is 501 1855. The FAQ says these are ISP-80 IPI Disk controller. What is a ISP-80 IPI disk controller? There is a "diag" switch and a header that says something about connecting to a maintenance terminal. Probably won't put one in my 3/470 but would like to know what I have. Thanks Bill K7NOM From mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Thu Feb 15 01:50:05 2001 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:50:05 -0500 (EST) From: der Mouse mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ? VME SCSI card > I brought home two VME cards that I think are SCSI interface cards. > The part number is 501 1855. The FAQ says these are ISP-80 IPI Disk > controller. IPI is not SCSI. The connector on the card is mechanically identical, but that's about where it ends. There are a max of four disks per controller, if (wetware) memory serves. I don't know how technically good or bad IPI is as an interface, but I don't think it's compatible with anything else in the known universe. (One of my workplaces just threw out six IPI drives...heavy power-hungry beasts. You could probably get as much SCSI disk space for what it would have cost to ship the drives, unless you're in Montreal. We had them on 4/470s.) der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From mjpento@mediaone.net Thu Feb 15 01:55:47 2001 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:55:47 -0500 From: mjpento mjpento@mediaone.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Adding a hard drive to Sparc5 Hello folks, I have a sparc5 with a 9.1 gig hd installed, I have added and successfully formatted a 1 gig hd, but, I am having a really hard time adding the drive to the system so that I can access it. Can anyone provide any sources of information on this topic? Maybe a website that has information on the installation of drives? I have found very little on my own. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mike From garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Thu Feb 15 05:06:18 2001 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 23:06:18 -0600 From: Garry Garrett garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs Ted wrote: > > [1] Forth prompt from terminal: Is it possible to get into the forth > prompt from a serial terminal? Will I have to find a new monitor? > Any kinds of terminal to seek out or avoid? Hard to find a terminal that doesn't emulate VT100 (VT102, VT220, VT320, etc. - all supersets of the previous model). If you are thinking about a null modem cable and a terminal emulation program, make sure the program can send CTRL-BREAK (the equiv of Stop-A). > [2] Jumpering an internal fujitsu HD: The replacement drive I got is > a 4 gig, 50 pin narrow SCSI drive. It has a warning sticker that > says the outside of the drive must not be grounded. There are 3 > clusters of jumpers on the bottom of the drive: > > (ascii-picture of bottom of drive, jumper pins are numbered) > ----------------------------- > | o o "TRM1" |50 pin connector > | o o o o "SY" |on this side > | o=o o o "R" | > | o o "WP" | > | o=o "TM" | > | | > | o o "ID0" | > | o o "ID1 |power connector > | o o "ID2" |here > ----------------------------- > > Currently only the "TM" jumper and the 3rd one in the "TRM1" cluster > are jumpered. Jumper settings should be defined on the vendor's web page. Go out to http://www.fujitsu.com/ > I know only two things so far: internal drives must not have TERMPWR > set (whatever that is), and that by default Sun hardware likes to > boot SCSI ID3. Suns really don't care. Which drive to boot off of is an NVRAM setting. Here is the "target 3" scoop. In the old days, of SunOS 4.x, the kernel came configured with targets 0, 1, 2 and 3 as hard drives, targets 4 & 5 as tape drives, and target 6 as a CD-ROM. If you wanted something different, you had to recompile the kernel (now you can just "boot -r" or "touch /reconfigure"). Suns were *sold* with the internal drive as target 3. Why? Because if you really didn't know what you were doing, when you went to add a drive, you would buy an external one and just plug it in. It came targeted as target 0 from the factory. When you bought a 2nd drive, you would set that to 1, plug it in, etc. When you bought a 3rd external drive, you made it target 2. If you bought a 4th external drive, you'd target it as 3, and have a SCSI ID conflict. If you don't know what you are doing, such that you'd target the drive to the same as the internal drive, you're at the point where you need to recompile the kernel and you have no business attempting that (just buy another SCSI card). By making the internal drive target 3, they were looking out for people who didn't know what they were doing. You can make (at the OK> prompt) a "devalias" for any drive you want, and use setenv to tell your box to boot off of that device. > Anyone have any idea how to jumper this drive? > > [3] Overheating & compatibility issues with HyperSPARC cpus: Sorry, not something I can help you with. -- Garry Garrett http://garrett.no-ip.com/ ._o o __o |> <\ -\<, 4 . . .. /> . . .. ...O/ O From airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Thu Feb 15 06:00:13 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:00:13 -0600 (CST) From: Dan Debertin airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 'ps' on diskless workstation On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Harri Haataja wrote: > > Is /proc really the proc file system (ls and cat around)? No, it really isn't, now that you mention it ;). /proc appears to be empty. I did a quick 'mount /proc', and everything seems fine. I eventually troubleshot it to an error in the vfstab; /etc/rcS was erroring out on my entry for / before it ever got to /proc. Fixed that line; it's working fine now. Thanks, Dan Debertin airboss@dusk.bitstream.net From garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Thu Feb 15 06:02:57 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:02:57 -0600 From: Garry Garrett garry@cx281507-a.blvue1.ne.home.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System I presume that you meant: http://www.tomshardware.com/storage/01q1/010129/index.html Read it. In spite of the fact that the author tries very hard to make it look like IDE is able to keep up, if you read it closely you'll see that they admit that it does not. For starters, they are comparing SCSI on a PC to IDE on a PC, which may or may not apply to SCSI on a Sun vs. IDE on a Sun. Typically, Suns have a significantly faster bus than PCs of the same vintage. Celron uses the Pentium III command set, but many of the periphrial chips of the Pentium II. Another base assumption of theirs is that IDE cards only support 4 drives, however typically have 2 drives on them, whereas they *assume* that if you have a SCSI card that you are necessarily going to have 7 drives on the card just because you can. If you were going to compare apples to apples, then you would have the same number of drives on each card, right? They don't have an SCA connector, so they get a *narrow* adaptor. One has to wonder what effect that has on the performance. Next, they compare a 36GB SCSI drive an a 9 GB SCSI drive to a 30GB IDE drive. More apples to oranges... When the IDE drive doesn't out perform the SCSI one of the same vintage, "Tom" blames it on the RPM of the drive. Sure, that *may* be true, but perhaps if you spun the IDE faster, it still would go through the IDE bus any faster? We'll never know because the IDE drive isn't 10,000 RPM, it is 7,200 RPM. I'm supposed to be impressed that the IDE run's cooler? I suppose, if I had a PC, and therefore had poorly designed air flow, that might be a factor, but not a factor on which drive is faster. Finally the article concludes with Tom tells us that the IDE drive did loose, but he excuses it by implying that it didn't loose by "that much". He also points out that SCSI drives are optimized for multitasking (a claim that is based on *nothing*), which is exactly what you would be doing on a Sun. I'm sorry, but this article, when carefully read, says "buy SCSI". Kim & Kyle Bedell wrote: > > Anyone whos anyone oughta check here ------------> www.tomshardware.com > if u still think IDE drives are slow,........here's a wake up call. > > regards > > Kyle > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anthony A. D. Talltree" > To: "'Brian'" ; "Brödersen Jacob K Civ HQ ACC/DRKI" > > Cc: "'suns-at-hme@net-kitchen.com'" > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Advice on New System > > > >Just say NO! to IDE drives. > > > > Hence the AXi. > > _______________________________________________ > > Suns-at-Home mailing list > > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home -- Garry Garrett http://garrett.no-ip.com/ ._o o __o |> <\ -\<, 4 . . .. /> . . .. ...O/ O From airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Thu Feb 15 06:07:19 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:07:19 -0600 (CST) From: Dan Debertin airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SES/B Sbus expansion VME card On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Michael Schiller wrote: > I have an SS690MP (in my kitchen!) lucky you! My employer has a 670MP that I'd love to take home, but I'm having trouble negotiating with my spouse over the noise ;). How bad are your power bills? When I've turned the machine on at work, I see the pull on our UPS jump pretty high. Dan Debertin airboss@dusk.bitstream.net From alexios@vennea.demon.co.uk Thu Feb 15 11:12:04 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:12:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Alexios Chouchoulas alexios@vennea.demon.co.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ? VME SCSI card On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Bill Janssen wrote: > I brought home two VME cards that I think are SCSI interface cards. > The part number is 501 1855. The FAQ says these are ISP-80 IPI Disk > controller. > > What is a ISP-80 IPI disk controller? It's a controller for IPI (Intelligent Peripheral Interface) hard disks. Not a SCSI host adapter. :-) Suns connected to right about all types of HDD of the day: SCSI, SMD, IPI, ESDI and even MFM/RLL (through SCSI-to-ESDI and SCSI-to-MFM bridges). My own 3/160 came with SCSI, MFM and SMD. :-) You'll need an IPI disk for this beastie. Copying from the Sun Hardware FAQ [1]: --- CUT HERE ----------------------------------------------------------- IPI --- IPI stands for Intelligent Peripheral Interface. It moves much of the low-level I/O processing to the interface controller, relieving the system CPU of the burden. Disks are daisy-chained as with SCSI, but up to eight units are supported on one controller. As with SCSI, the chain must be terminated. The maximum disk tranfer rate is 6M per second. Note that more than four disks on a controller usually loads it heavily and can cause the system to be unstable. With high-performance disks capable of sustained 6M per second transfers, even three can be too much. Performance information for some Sun stock IPI disks: CAPACITY 911M 1.3G FORM FACTOR (in) 8 5.25 AVERAGE SEEK (ms) 15 11.5 RAW DISK TRANSFER 6 3.5-4 RATE (Mbps) PERFORMANCE (Kbps)* 1368 1408 RPM 3600 5400 MTBF (hours) 50,000 100,000 CONTROLLER ISP-80 ISP-80 * "Sun performs a combination of random and sequential benchmarks to develop an overall measurement of performance for mass-storage products. These tests are performed on Sun systems and a geometric mean is calculated to generate a composite of the performance that a typical user might expect." --- CUT HERE ----------------------------------------------------------- Alexios [1] http://www.sunhelp.org/faq/sunref5.html, among *many* other places. =----------------------------------------------= 64*>:00p258**44$$^>4$,1-:#v_v | Alexios Chouchoulas, the Unpronounceable One | 4$#^; BEFUNGE97 ;^#_@#:-1$>#< | http://www.vennea.demon.co.uk/ | 4*2-*26g00*:-*58: I have a sparc5 with a 9.1 gig hd installed, I have added and > successfully formatted a 1 gig hd, What was wrong with it that it needed formatting? Could this be related? A disk modern enough to be even approximately 1G generally has to have something pretty drastic go wrong with it for it to need (re)formatting. > but, I am having a really hard time adding the drive to the system so > that I can access it. > Can anyone provide any sources of information on this topic? Not without knowing what OS you're running, not really. This is primarily an OS issue, and of the four OSes I know of that run on SPARCs (I think they all run on the 5), I know the necessary procedures for one (NetBSD) and have good guesses for two more (Solaris and OpenBSD)...and one of the latter two (Solaris) is drastically different from the others. (The fourth is SparcLinux, and I know zilch about its procedures for this.) der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From david@catwhisker.org Thu Feb 15 15:12:42 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:12:42 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs >Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 23:06:18 -0600 >From: Garry Garrett >If you are thinking about a null modem cable and a terminal emulation >program, make sure the program can send CTRL-BREAK (the equiv of >Stop-A). Perhaps a minor nit (to be a tad redundant), but it may be useful to distinguish a little between the keystrokes used and what is sent down the line. First, what is wanted (in order to do the equivalent of L1-A or Stop-A using a "dumb terminal" is to generate a "framing error" -- that is, on a serial line, a sequence of enough consecutive 0-bits that it cannot possibly correspond to any valid character. (So for a serial line being used with 8-bit characters, no "parity" bits, and 1 stop bit, you would normally see a "start bit" (1), 8 "data bits" (any of which may be either 0 or 1), and a "stop bit" (1). So 9 consecutive 0 bits cannot correspond to any valid character with this framing. A BREAK sequence (which is not a "character" in the ASCII or any other character set) is something that will guarantee a "framing error". Some terminal (emulation programs) use the key labelled "BREAK" to do this; others may use a keyboard chord, such as SHIFT-BREAK or CONTROL-BREAK; especially in the case of emulation programs, it is often a key sequence (such as ~# immediately following a newline in "tip"). Interrupting the serial connection in question will frequently also cause such a framing error, which is why it's good to be aware of what's going on if you're in a position where such an interruption is likely. Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. From bt@insiders-fs.com Thu Feb 15 14:30:32 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:30:32 +0100 From: Volker Borchert bt@insiders-fs.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs Garry Garrett writes: |> Suns were *sold* with the internal drive as target 3. Why? Because |> if you really didn't know what you were doing, when you went to add |> a drive, you would buy an external one and just plug it in. Not really. The Sun-3 series had the first drive at target 0. Sun-4 machines had the first drive at target 3 so that you could connect your precious old hard disk taken from your Sun-3 without rejumpering. This was intended to ease the transition from Sun-3 to Sun-4, but (IMHO) caused much more trouble than it was worth. Some OBP versions have an envariable to re-map SCSI IDs. From sun@minor-element.net Thu Feb 15 16:07:54 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:07:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Martin Wedel sun@minor-element.net Subject: Utility Bill of a 670 Was : [Suns-at-Home] SES/B Sbus expansion VME card Dan, for what it's worth, I estimate that I pay around 60$ a month here in St Louis to run my 670MP and matching Mass Storage unit. Thats with quad SM51's running 4 instances of Seti@home, 6 Full size full height elite9 hardrives, and a vt220 to monitor logs. I have a picture of it on my site listed below. p.s. Gotta wonder though, how much it saves me on gas for the furnace during the winter ;) -- Martin Wedel sun@minor-element.net http://www.minor-element.net/ On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Dan Debertin wrote: > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Michael Schiller wrote: > > How bad are your power bills? When I've turned the machine on at work, I > see the pull on our UPS jump pretty high. > > Dan Debertin > airboss@dusk.bitstream.net > From m_thompson@ids.net Thu Feb 15 16:04:21 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:04:21 -0500 From: Michael Thompson m_thompson@ids.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ? VME SCSI card >I brought home two VME cards that I think are SCSI interface cards. >The part number is 501 1855. The FAQ says these are ISP-80 IPI Disk >controller. > >What is a ISP-80 IPI disk controller? There is a "diag" switch and a >header that >says something about connecting to a maintenance terminal. > >Probably won't put one in my 3/470 but would like to know what I have. > >Thanks >Bill K7NOM The ISP-80 controller is for IPI disks. They use a 50 pin D-Sub connector like Sun-3 SCSI. I have three 1.2GB 9" IPI disks on my 4/470. They are will work on your 3/470. Michael Thompson E-Mail: M_Thompson@IDS.net From sun@minor-element.net Thu Feb 15 16:46:55 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:46:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Martin Wedel sun@minor-element.net Subject: Utility Bill of a 670 Was : [Suns-at-Home] SES/B Sbus expansion VME card Why, looking for aliens of course! Seti@home is a program that you run on your machine that allows you to join a large collaborative effort to process all the data mined from the SETI project. Check out www.setiathome.com for more details. I run for copies (instances) just to give each proc something to do when they aren't serving up webpages and samba shares to my home network. It kinda works like a thermostat for my bedroom (yes, the 670 is in my bedroom and my g/f doesn't even mind) I swear, it gets noticeably warmer the higher the load, more than you'd expect. Guess I'll have to cut back to one seti instance in the summer ;) -- Martin Wedel sun@minor-element.net http://www.minor-element.net/ On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Zachary Uram wrote: > whoa > what is an Seti@home instance and why u running 4? > what u using this system to do? > From tfitz@MIT.EDU Thu Feb 15 19:30:13 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:30:13 -0500 From: Tom Fitzgerald tfitz@MIT.EDU Subject: [Suns-at-Home] ? VME SCSI card > IPI is not SCSI. The connector on the card is mechanically identical, > but that's about where it ends. There are a max of four disks per > controller, if (wetware) memory serves. I don't know how technically > good or bad IPI is as an interface, but I don't think it's compatible > with anything else in the known universe. (One of my workplaces just > threw out six IPI drives...heavy power-hungry beasts. You could > probably get as much SCSI disk space for what it would have cost to > ship the drives, unless you're in Montreal. We had them on 4/470s.) A flaw with many (all?) IPI drives is that they need to be backed up, reformatted and restored every year or two, or the data rots away. I don't know if this was a universal quality, but it was true of all (4) of the IPI disks I've ever had to deal with. From mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Thu Feb 15 17:34:52 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:34:52 -0500 (EST) From: der Mouse mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs >> [...] make sure the program can send CTRL-BREAK (the equiv of >> Stop-A). > First, what is wanted (in order to do the equivalent of L1-A or > Stop-A using a "dumb terminal" is to generate a "framing error" -- Well...this depends on the OS. Some serial line hardware (and I think the 8530s that Sun tends to use qualify) can distinguish between a break condition and other framing errors. As you say, a framing error is, basically, any signal sequence that has a start bit but doesn't have a valid stop bit at the correct time. A break condition is a particular subclass of framing error which consists, loosely speaking, of a very wide start bit with no data or stop bits. And the serial-line interrupt routine, which is where console abort is handled, may be written so as to abort on any framing error, or only on break...or whatever its author feels like; in principle, it could be written to abort on receiving "ok> ". The only source tree I have handy to look at is a NetBSD one, and in that one aborts happen only on break, not other framing errors. (Or at least, they happen only when the "BREAK detected" bit is set, and there is a different "framing error detected" bit; I haven't got the 8530 datasheets to read to know exactly when those bits get set.) der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From negativl@best.com Thu Feb 15 17:09:35 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:09:35 -0800 (PST) From: Raymond Wong negativl@best.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs Volker Borchert wrote: > Garry Garrett writes: > > |> Suns were *sold* with the internal drive as target 3. Why? Because > |> if you really didn't know what you were doing, when you went to add > |> a drive, you would buy an external one and just plug it in. > > Not really. The Sun-3 series had the first drive at target 0. > Sun-4 machines had the first drive at target 3 so that you could > connect your precious old hard disk taken from your Sun-3 without > rejumpering. This was intended to ease the transition from Sun-3 > to Sun-4, but (IMHO) caused much more trouble than it was worth. Closer, but there's a tiny bit more to it. Just let me get my "uphill both ways" hat on, and I'll tell you all what it was actually like in the old days. ;) As it happens, the SparcStation 1 was the first Sun workstation to come *standard* with an internal hard drive. In the Sun 3/* days, there was no *standard* hard drive, it was an option/add-on: you could order the shoebox or not. The shoebox generally had 1 or 2 drives, ID 0, 1, or 0 & 1. The shoeboxen were a PITA to change ID on, as this was also the days before ID select wheels. If you were a "typical" sun shop with multiple workstations, spending a few days unscrewing cases, unplugging cables, unscrewing boards, and generally tearing apart shoeboxes to get at the drives, wasn't exactly appealing. So, part of the problem is that not everyone HAD shoeboxen on their Sun 3/*. Those that did often had a lot, so Sun was trying to find a solution that minimized efforts on both. Sun's solution was to change the default scsiID to make life more convenient on their existing customer base. That it also makes life simpler on the "black-box" admin is a nice side effect. For a lot of us, it made zero difference. As expensive as hard drives were, they still didn't compare to the cost of a new workstation. It was easy enough to not reclaim those shoeboxes when ordering new machines. A few sites that did trade-in/upgrades probably made the actual decision, since that would be time from a Sun FE to do the actual ID changes (Sites doing trade-in were also more likely to rely on the vendor to do the changeover). Ray Wong PO BOX 6163 negativl at best.com, negativl at netcom.com Hayward, CA 94540-6163 Member #11537, Deborah Gibson International Fan Club Co-Founder and Charter Member, Sutton Foster International Fan Club From campbell@mindless.com Fri Feb 16 08:17:32 2001 Date: 16 Feb 2001 21:17:32 +1300 From: campbell steven campbell@mindless.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun IPX modem cable and mouse problems Hi, I have aquired a Sun sparc station IPX, I am wanting to connect my 56k modem to it via the serial port. My modem has a DB9 plug on it. Can anyone point me to a site where I can find pin outs to make this cable? Also the machine came with a optical mouse, the boxy rectangular shaped one but with no pad, I printed out one of the postscript pad, and i can get *some* movement out of it but only on the vertical axis, it doesn't seem to move horizontally at all. Only one of the leds lights on the bottom of the mouse lights up i'm not sure if that has any thing to do with it or not. Out of interest under ideal circumstances how do these optical mice perform compared to your average mouse. Thanks in advance Campbell Steven From sunsathome@dobyns.com Fri Feb 16 08:00:10 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:10 -0800 From: Barry A. Dobyns sunsathome@dobyns.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: in.named pain and suffering #!/usr/bin/perl ## Copyright (c) 1996, 1997 by Internet Software Consortium ## ## Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any ## purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above ## copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. ## ## THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND INTERNET SOFTWARE CONSORTIUM DISCLAIMS ## ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES ## OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL INTERNET SOFTWARE ## CONSORTIUM BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL ## DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR ## PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ## ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS ## SOFTWARE. ## $Id: named-bootconf.pl,v 8.16 1998/02/13 19:48:25 halley Exp $ # This is a filter. Input is a named.boot. Output is a named.conf. $new_config = ""; $have_options = 0; %options = (); %options_comments = (); @topology = (); @topology_comments = (); @bogus = (); @bogus_comments = (); @transfer_acl = (); @transfer_comments = (); $logging = ""; while(<>) { next if /^$/; # skip comment-only lines if (/^\s*;+\s*(.*)$/) { $new_config .= "// $1\n"; next; } # handle continued lines while (/\\$/) { s/\\$/ /; $_ .= <>; } chop; # deal with lines ending in a coment if (s/\s*;+\s*(.*)$//) { $comment = "// $1"; } else { $comment = ""; } ($directive, @rest) = split; $class = ""; if ($directive =~ /^(.*)\/(.*)$/) { $directive = $1; $class = $2; } if ($directive eq "primary") { $zname = shift(@rest); &maybe_print_comment("","\n"); $new_config .= "zone \"$zname\" "; if ($class ne "") { $new_config .= "$class "; } $new_config .= "{\n"; $new_config .= "\ttype master;\n"; $filename = shift(@rest); $new_config .= "\tfile \"$filename\";\n"; $new_config .= "};\n\n"; } elsif ($directive eq "secondary" || $directive eq "stub") { if ($directive eq "secondary") { $type = "slave"; } else { $type = "stub"; } $zname = shift(@rest); &maybe_print_comment("","\n"); $new_config .= "zone \"$zname\" "; if ($class ne "") { $new_config .= "$class "; } $new_config .= "{\n"; $new_config .= "\ttype $type;\n"; $filename = pop(@rest); if ($filename =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/) { push(@rest, $filename); $filename = ""; } else { $new_config .= "\tfile \"$filename\";\n"; } $new_config .= "\tmasters {\n"; foreach $master (@rest) { $new_config .= "\t\t$master;\n"; } $new_config .= "\t};\n"; $new_config .= "};\n\n"; } elsif ($directive eq "cache") { $zname = shift(@rest); &maybe_print_comment("","\n"); $new_config .= "zone \"$zname\" {\n"; $new_config .= "\ttype hint;\n"; $filename = shift(@rest); $new_config .= "\tfile \"$filename\";\n"; $new_config .= "};\n\n"; } elsif ($directive eq "directory") { $options{"directory"} = "\"$rest[0]\""; $options_comments{"directory"} = $comment; $have_options = 1; } elsif ($directive eq "check-names") { $type = shift(@rest); if ($type eq "primary") { $type = "master"; } elsif ($type eq "secondary") { $type = "slave"; } $action = shift(@rest); $options{"check-names $type"} = $action; $options_comments{"check-names $type"} = $comment; $have_options = 1; } elsif ($directive eq "forwarders") { $options{"forwarders"}="{\n"; foreach $forwarder (@rest) { $options{"forwarders"} .= "\t\t$forwarder;\n"; } $options{"forwarders"} .= "\t}"; $options_comments{"forwarders"} = $comment; $have_options = 1; } elsif ($directive eq "slave") { &handle_options("forward-only"); } elsif ($directive eq "options") { &handle_options(@rest); } elsif ($directive eq "limit") { &handle_limit(@rest); } elsif ($directive eq "include") { $new_config .= "// make sure your include is still in the right place\n"; $comment = "\t" . $comment; $new_config .= "include \"$rest[0]\";$comment\n\n"; } elsif ($directive eq "xfrnets" || $directive eq "tcplist") { if ($comment ne "") { $comment = "\t$comment"; } foreach $elt (@rest) { push(@transfer_acl, $elt); push(@transfer_comments, $comment); } $have_options = 1; } elsif ($directive eq "sortlist") { if ($comment ne "") { $comment = "\t$comment"; } foreach $elt (@rest) { push(@topology, $elt); push(@topology_comments, $comment); } } elsif ($directive eq "bogusns") { if ($comment ne "") { $comment = "\t$comment"; } foreach $elt (@rest) { push(@bogus, $elt); push(@bogus_comments, $comment); } } elsif ($directive eq "max-fetch") { $options{"transfers-in"}=$rest[0]; $options_comments{"transfers-in"}=$comment; $have_options = 1; } else { $new_config .= "// NOTE: unconverted directive '$directive @rest'\n\n"; } } print "// generated by named-bootconf.pl\n\n"; if ($have_options) { print "options {\n"; foreach $option (sort(keys(%options))) { print "\t$option $options{$option};"; if ($options_comments{$option} ne "") { print "\t$options_comments{$option}"; } print "\n"; } if (@transfer_acl > 0) { print "\tallow-transfer {\n"; for ($i = 0; $i <= $#transfer_acl; $i++) { &print_maybe_masked("\t\t", $transfer_acl[$i], $transfer_comments[$i]); } print "\t};\n"; } print "\t/* \t * If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want \t * to talk to, you might need to uncomment the query-source \t * directive below. Previous versions of BIND always asked \t * questions using port 53, but BIND 8.1 uses an unprivileged \t * port by default. \t */ \t// query-source address * port 53; "; print "};\n\n"; } if ($logging ne "") { print "logging {\n$logging};\n\n"; } if (@topology > 0) { print "// Note: the following will be supported in a future release.\n"; print "/*\n"; print "host { any; } {\n\ttopology {\n"; for ($i = 0; $i <= $#topology; $i++) { &print_maybe_masked("\t\t", $topology[$i], $topology_comments[$i]); } print "\t};\n};\n"; print "*/\n"; print "\n"; } if (@bogus > 0) { for ($i = 0; $i <= $#bogus; $i++) { print "server $bogus[$i] { bogus yes; };$bogus_comments[$i]\n"; } print "\n"; } print $new_config; exit 0; sub maybe_print_comment { $prefix = shift; $suffix = shift; if ($comment ne "") { $new_config .= sprintf("%s%s%s", $prefix, $comment, $suffix); } } sub handle_options { foreach $option (@_) { if ($option eq "forward-only") { $options{"forward"}="only"; $options_comments{"forward"}=$comment; $have_options = 1; } elsif ($option eq "no-recursion") { $options{"recursion"}="no"; $options_comments{"recursion"}=$comment; $have_options = 1; } elsif ($option eq "no-fetch-glue") { $options{"fetch-glue"}="no"; $options_comments{"fetch-glue"}=$comment; $have_options = 1; } elsif ($option eq "fake-iquery") { $options{"fake-iquery"}="yes"; $options_comments{"fake-iquery"}=$comment; $have_options = 1; } elsif ($option eq "query-log") { if ($comment ne "") { $logging .= "\t$comment\n"; } $logging .= "\tcategory queries { default_syslog; };\n"; } else { $options{"// NOTE: unconverted option '$option'"}=""; $options_comments{"// NOTE: unconverted option '$option'"}= $comment; $have_options = 1; } } } sub handle_limit { $limit = shift; if ($limit eq "datasize" || $limit eq "transfers-in" || $limit eq "transfers-per-ns" || $limit eq "files") { $options{$limit}=$_[0]; $options_comments{$limit}=$comment; $have_options = 1; } else { $options{"// NOTE: unconverted limit '$limit @_'"}=""; $options_comments{"// NOTE: unconverted limit '$limit @_'"}=$comment; $have_options = 1; } } sub print_maybe_masked { # this assumes a contiguous netmask starting at the MSB $prefix = shift; $elt = shift; $elt_comment = shift; if ($elt =~ /^(.*)&(.*)$/) { $address = $1; $mask = $2; ($m1,$m2,$m3,$m4) = split(/\./, $mask); $mask_val = ($m1 << 24) + ($m2 << 16) +($m3 << 8) + $m4; $zero_bits = 0; while (($mask_val % 2) == 0) { $mask_val /= 2; $zero_bits++; } $mask_bits = 32 - $zero_bits; } else { $address = $elt; ($a1,$a2,$a3,$a4) = split(/\./, $address); if ($a1 < 128) { $mask_bits = 8; } elsif ($a1 < 192) { $mask_bits = 16; } else { $mask_bits = 24; } } print "$prefix$address"; if ($mask_bits != 32) { print "/$mask_bits"; } print ";$elt_comment\n"; } # #----- Original Message ----- #From: "Sandwich Maker" #To: #Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 4:38 PM #Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: in.named pain and suffering # # "From: Jan Steinman # " # "Before I go crawling through the (overly complex) man page, does # "anyone have a script to translate old named.boot files to named.conf # "format? # # no, but i - rummaging around stokely.com i think - found a script that # sets your system up to be a cacheing dns server, and it handles both # bind 4 [old] and bind 8 [new] style configs. it didn't properly # detect that my old 2.5 system was bind 4 though. # _____________________________________________________________________ # Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor # internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more # adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) # _______________________________________________ # Suns-at-Home mailing list # Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com # http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home # From bdavies@hotmail.com Thu Feb 15 22:22:30 2001 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:22:30 -0800 From: brian davies bdavies@hotmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sun4c gear for free (almost) It's spring cleaning time around my house and with that, it's time to get rid of my old sun4c gear. I'm not using it, and I'd much rather give it away, then throw it away. All four of these boxes have dead NVRAM, but all have salvagable parts. With the exception of the SPARCstation2, all boxes are FREE, but the acquirer (that's you) pays packaging/shipping/handling. I'm in Seattle, Washington, so use that as your yardstick for whether or not you'd be willing to pay shipping expenses. After this lot goes, I've got a SPARCstation 10 and a SPARCstation 20, plus a few SBus cards (2 Quad Ethernet, 1 10/100 Ethernet) to get rid of, but I haven't figured out what would be fair pricing on those boxes yet. And, I've got a Weitek chip extractor/installer that someone could make better use of then me. Thanks, brian Machine details: Machine 1: ========== SPARCstation 1, No keyboard. ROM Rev. 1.3, 12 MB memory installed, Serial #16777215. Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, Host ID: ffffffff. SPARCstation 1 details: - No floppy - No video - No hard drive sleds - 12 MB RAM (12 x 1 MB SIMMS - Mix of Sun and Non Sun memory) Dead NVRAM, but this machine will boot if you put a disk into it. Machine 2: ========== SPARCstation 1+ details: - working floppy - 1 hard drive sled - no memory - case damaged - the previous owner snapped one of the front case tabs off. No memory, so I wasn't able to pull a banner off this one. This is actually the worst of the lot. As noted above, the case for this machine was abused by an impatient user. Machine 3: ========== SPARCstation IPX WARNING: Unable to determine keyboard type FAILURE: No Trap Taken, Exp Trap Type = 00000009 SPARCstation IPX details: - New power supply - 424 MB hard drive - working floppy - 32 MB RAM (2 x 16 MB SIMMS - Non Sun memory) - Dataram 64 MB Memory Expansion card (takes an SBus slot) - 2 serial cables (8-pin DIN to 25-pin) - AUI to 10baseT transceiver (Cabletron) Hmmm... This was odd as this machine used to boot properly. I cannibalized it for memory when I got my LX. The Dataram card is questionable. I picked up two for free, but I never got around to fully testing them. This one seemed to work, but *I* wouldn't bet any money on it. The power supply on this machine is a brand new (remanufactured) one from Sun which I managed to pick up. I suspect this problem is CPU related as this box had a Weitek PowerUP in it at one point before I swapped it out into another machine. Machine 4: ========== SPARCstation 2, No Keyboard ROM Rev. 2.9, 128 MB memory installed, Serial #16777215. Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, Host ID: ffffffff. SPARCstation 2 details: - Weitek PowerUP processor - working floppy - 424 MB and 207 MB hard drives - Turbo GX Frame Buffer - 64 MB RAM (16 x 4 MB SIMMS all Sun memory) - Dataram 64 MB Memory Expansion card (takes an SBus slot) - AUI to 10baseT transceiver (Cabletron) This was my main machine before I picked up my LX and then an SS20. The NVRAM is a recent death. I was able to boot the machine to the Solaris 2.4 installation on the 424 disk. As with the IPX, the Dataram card is questionable. Occasionally, the machine was unable to successfully test the expansion memory, and other times it worked fine. I'd like to get $50 (and shipping, etc.) for this box for sentimental reasons, but again, I'd like to rid of it so let's talk. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com From bt@insiders-fs.com Fri Feb 16 14:45:06 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:45:06 +0100 From: Volker Borchert bt@insiders-fs.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs In message <200102151734.MAA17567@Twig.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> you write: |> Some serial line hardware (and I think the 8530s that Sun tends to use |> qualify) can distinguish between a break condition and other framing |> errors. Of course. The 8530 (successor to the famous Z80-SIO) is one of the most sophisticated serial I/O controllers available. IIRC it even supplies different interrupt vectors for these conditions. Vol"Zilog forever"ker From mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Fri Feb 16 15:35:51 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:35:51 -0500 (EST) From: der Mouse mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun IPX modem cable and mouse problems > I have aquired a Sun sparc station IPX, I am wanting to connect my > 56k modem to it via the serial port. My modem has a DB9 plug on it. > Can anyone point me to a site where I can find pin outs to make this > cable? Not unless www.sunhelp.org's collection of Sun info has one somewhere. But I have plenty of miniDIN8-to-DB25 cables, including one pukka Sun one; I can always describe that pinout. I think I have a DB25-to-DB9 cable somewhere too; I could connect them and check the result. Let me know if you'd like me to and I'll do it. (I can't right now; it's at home and I'm not.) > Also the machine came with a optical mouse, the boxy rectangular > shaped one but with no pad, I printed out one of the postscript pad, > and i can get *some* movement out of it but only on the vertical > axis, it doesn't seem to move horizontally at all. That matches my experience with trying to use other than matching pads. > Only one of the leds lights on the bottom of the mouse lights up i'm > not sure if that has any thing to do with it or not. Most likely they both actually light up; it's just that one is a colour the human eye can't see. (Infrared, I suspect.) I've never seen a Sun optical mouse that has both LEDs visibly lit.... > Out of interest under ideal circumstances how do these optical mice > perform compared to your average mouse. I don't have that much experience, but, well, for optical mice I find them to be pretty good. (Of course, optical mice have many differences from mechanical mice; depending on the context, they may be advantages or disadvantages. The major one that comes to mind is that the coordinate system of an optical mouse is tied to the pad rather than the mouse.) der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From geaga@lainet.com Fri Feb 16 16:17:50 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:17:50 -0800 From: Jorge V. Geaga geaga@lainet.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris 2.3 manuals Hi Dwight: Your note from 1997 indicated a Solaris 2.3 manual set. I have just resurrected a Sparc 1+ with Solaris 2.3 installed and am seeking a manual set which can help me reconfigure the machine to add 1) another SCSI drive 2) install an exabyte (SCSI) 3) install a 150 Mb QIC tape drive (SCSI). Thanks for your help. Jorge From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Fri Feb 16 18:54:15 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:54:15 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs "From: Raymond Wong " "As it happens, the SparcStation 1 was the first Sun workstation to "come *standard* with an internal hard drive. In the Sun 3/* days, what about the 3/80? it had the same chassis [my ss2 is wearing a 3/80 lid right now] and -could- have internal drives... _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Fri Feb 16 18:49:03 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:49:03 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: ? VME SCSI card "From: Tom Fitzgerald " "A flaw with many (all?) IPI drives is that they need to be backed up, "reformatted and restored every year or two, or the data rots away. " "I don't know if this was a universal quality, but it was true of all (4) "of the IPI disks I've ever had to deal with. i've seen it on smd drives also. i always thought it was because of the temperature these old monsters ran at. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From Jan@Bytesmiths.com Fri Feb 16 18:17:01 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:17:01 -0800 From: Jan Steinman Jan@Bytesmiths.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: in.named pain and suffering >#!/usr/bin/perl [script deleted] Thanks, Barry! I now have it working, and successfully doing lookups and serving as my LAN's primary DNS. Unfortunately, getting Network Solutions and three other registrars to go along with this has become a major PITA... I think many hours will have been spent on hold, and many emails will have been exchanged before I'm actually serving these domains to The World... :-( BTW: real cute how you made the original thread a comment in the perl script... :-) -- : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 From mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Fri Feb 16 18:57:34 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:57:34 -0500 (EST) From: der Mouse mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA Subject: [Suns-at-Home] serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs >> Some serial line hardware (and I think the 8530s that Sun tends to >> use qualify) can distinguish between a break condition and other >> framing errors. > Of course. The 8530 (successor to the famous Z80-SIO) is one of the > most sophisticated serial I/O controllers available. Ouch. The serial line world is in trouble. No FIFO to speak of, ÷32 and ÷64 but nothing between ÷1 and ÷16, a ÷1 mode that borders on unusable for input, and all the problems listed in the comment block in sys/dev/ic/z850reg.h (in NetBSD - most briefly: "everything multiplexed out the wazoo", bits scattered all over, registers with incompatible read and write functionality, no decent separation between the two channels, the "point high" stupidity crammed in with various resets and enables, schizoid bits-per-char values, hardware flow control that uses the wrong signals). der Mouse mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B From aad@talltree.net Fri Feb 16 22:39:14 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:39:14 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony A. D. Talltree aad@talltree.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs >"As it happens, the SparcStation 1 was the first Sun workstation to >"come *standard* with an internal hard drive. In the Sun 3/* days, >what about the 3/80? it had the same chassis [my ss2 is wearing a >3/80 lid right now] and -could- have internal drives... IIRC the 3/80 came out after the SS1. In a former life my boss stuck my employer with scores of them because he didn't trust sun4's yet. From dmucciol@genuity.com Fri Feb 16 22:37:29 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:37:29 -0500 From: David Muccioli dmucciol@genuity.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris 2.3 manuals "Jorge V. Geaga" wrote: > > Hi Dwight: > > Your note from 1997 indicated a Solaris 2.3 manual set. I have > just resurrected a Sparc 1+ with Solaris 2.3 installed and am > seeking a manual set which can help me reconfigure the machine > to add > I would suggest http://docs.sun.com but they only appear to have Solaris 2.4 to present :-( DM -- @-----------------------------------------------------------------@ | David Muccioli 410-309-8650 dmucciol@bbn.com | | Unix Systems Admin 800-378-2035 | @---------------------------@ Genuity @-------------------------@ "The result of any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" -- Arthur C. Clarke From duffner@fh-konstanz.de Fri Feb 16 23:17:37 2001 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:17:37 +0100 (CET) From: Rainer Duffner duffner@fh-konstanz.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris 2.3 manuals On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Jorge V. Geaga wrote: > Hi Dwight: > > Your note from 1997 indicated a Solaris 2.3 manual set. I have > just resurrected a Sparc 1+ with Solaris 2.3 installed and am > seeking a manual set which can help me reconfigure the machine > to add > > 1) another SCSI drive > 2) install an exabyte (SCSI) > 3) install a 150 Mb QIC tape drive (SCSI). Did they come with real manuals back then ? I guess, that was the last millennium... I'd say that a copy of the first edition of the Unix System Administration Handbook (Nemeth et.al.) might also be helpful. cheers, Rainer -- ======================================== Rainer Duffner , Konstanz, Germany eMail: duffner@fh-konstanz.de rainer.duffner@surf24.de http://www-stud.fh-konstanz.de/duffner/ ======================================== From negativl@best.com Fri Feb 16 21:54:22 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:54:22 -0800 (PST) From: Raymond Wong negativl@best.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: serial terminals, ss10 HDs, and hot hypersparcs Sandwich Maker wrote: > "From: Raymond Wong > " > "As it happens, the SparcStation 1 was the first Sun workstation to > "come *standard* with an internal hard drive. In the Sun 3/* days, > > what about the 3/80? it had the same chassis [my ss2 is wearing a > 3/80 lid right now] and -could- have internal drives... Well, since you mention it, the 3/80 was Sun's hedge bet. It came out mostly in case the SS1 flopped, but as you noticed, it's the SS1 chassis. It didn't predate the SS1. Internally, it doesn't share much with the rest of the Sun-3 line. AFAICR, it's the only 68030 based one, the rest being other motorola 680x0. Ray Wong PO BOX 6163 negativl at best.com, negativl at netcom.com Hayward, CA 94540-6163 Member #11537, Deborah Gibson International Fan Club Co-Founder and Charter Member, Sutton Foster International Fan Club From negativl@best.com Sat Feb 17 10:13:07 2001 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:13:07 -0800 (PST) From: Raymond Wong negativl@best.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris 2.3 manuals Rainer Duffner wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Jorge V. Geaga wrote: > > just resurrected a Sparc 1+ with Solaris 2.3 installed and am > > seeking a manual set which can help me reconfigure the machine > > to add > > > > 1) another SCSI drive > > 2) install an exabyte (SCSI) > > 3) install a 150 Mb QIC tape drive (SCSI). First off, the good news is that, for the most part, all of these devices were already in existence, so should be supported. The possible question mark is what generation of exabyte. The XL tapes were pretty new, though if memory serves they still worked. All 8mm before that definitely worked. Either a simple "boot -r" from the ok> prompt, or any of the other reconfig boots should work, or the more manual /usr/sbin/drvconfig /usr/sbin/devlinks /usr/sbin/disks etc... should work. > Did they come with real manuals back then ? > I guess, that was the last millennium... Actually, the manuals didn't ever exactly come standard, but they were an option and most folks knew to at least order one set when they started out. The cheap thing to get was the 2.3 answerbook CD, which looked suspiciously like a series of postscript formatted files containing the old printed style man pages... > I'd say that a copy of the first edition > of the Unix System Administration Handbook (Nemeth et.al.) > might also be helpful. The Windsor books from Sun (vol 1 & 2) would probably be more applicable, if you can find the older edition from 94/5ish. If you're going to run an old OS, make sure you have a complete media kit. Not being able to recover means it's a disposable system which you eventually just give up on. If you have the media kit for 2.3, search immediately for the packet that would have been marked "Late Breaking News" or something like that. It'll contain the workarounds for the bugs that were discovered after everything else was cast in stone. Failure to observe any procedures doc'd in your release could mean the system will not successfully reboot after a reinstall. (2.3 was one of the first versions of Solaris 2 to be mostly stable, in that it would boot of the install, the install would generally run. once you had a successful post-install reboot, it'd stay up for quite a while, barring other, more specific bugs. Getting that post-install reboot to happen was far from certain, however. I have been told of stable 2.0 installs, but was never able to witness one firsthand) Personally, I'd say the most useful thing to have for a SS1+ is a newer OS. Solaris 2.6 will work on that machine, and won't be that much slower in non-graphic mode. NetBSD and OpenBSD both have stable, bootable support for it, and are pretty quick. Heck, if you want to run a commercial OS, find a 4.1.3 CD and go to (gnu) town. It'll be a lot more stable and efficient (and no worse for support) than 2.3. (shuddering at memories of the nisplus that bundled with 2.3...) Ray Wong PO BOX 6163 negativl at best.com, negativl at netcom.com Hayward, CA 94540-6163 Member #11537, Deborah Gibson International Fan Club Co-Founder and Charter Member, Sutton Foster International Fan Club From shall1@columbus.rr.com Sat Feb 17 01:24:10 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:24:10 -0500 From: Sheldon T. Hall shall1@columbus.rr.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] IPX Serial and Mouse A Macintosh Plus modem cable will fit the IPX's serial ports. You'll need a 25-to-9 pin converter of the appropriate sexes. See the Stokely site at http://www.stokely.com/unix.serial.port.resources/modem.html Remember that the IPX's serial ports are ordinarily restricted to 38.4 kbps, and don't expect blazing performance from that 56k modem. "One LED on" is normal for the Type 4 mouse. You have to have the right pad, and it has to be turned the right way, for the mouse to work. With max RAM (64 megs) the IPX is a very nice box for the money, especially if you run it from either a serial console, telnet in, or use an X-terminal emulator on a PC. Running stuff from the console, i.e. on the real monitor, isn't quite so nice. -Shel >Message: 14 >From: campbell steven >To: suns-at-home@net-kitchen.com >Date: 16 Feb 2001 21:17:32 +1300 >Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun IPX modem cable and mouse problems > >Hi, > >I have aquired a Sun sparc station IPX, I am wanting to connect my 56k >modem to it via the serial port. My modem has a DB9 plug on it. Can >anyone point me to a site where I can find pin outs to make this cable? > >Also the machine came with a optical mouse, the boxy rectangular shaped >one but with no pad, I printed out one of the postscript pad, and i can >get *some* movement out of it but only on the vertical axis, it doesn't >seem to move horizontally at all. Only one of the leds lights on the >bottom of the mouse lights up i'm not sure if that has any thing to do >with it or not. > >Out of interest under ideal circumstances how do these optical mice >perform compared to your average mouse. > >Thanks in advance > >Campbell Steven From rjhawkin@nand.net Sat Feb 17 01:04:00 2001 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:04:00 -0500 (EST) From: Any Key rjhawkin@nand.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 6x0mp OS question Hello, I see that several of you out there are running the 6xxMP series of Suns. From what I know that 2.5.1 or 4.1.3_u were the last SunOS that supported the machine. When I looked a few months ago the various different *nix's didnt seem to have MP support available. I was wondering what the OS of Choice for MP support is? I have a 690MP myself though Its not 'up' at the moment, It was given to me as a gift when the company that had it was going to dumpster it because it had been EOL'd. I havent had time to try and get it going yet. I have the Desk-side chassis, 256M of RAM and a 2.0G drive. Its a Dual Processor, a Ross though I havent been able to find information about what the card is. It is currently in storage so I cant get to it really quick either (just moved). Rowan Hawkins Jack-Of-All-Trades -- Master-Of-None (JOAT-MON) From sun@minor-element.net Sat Feb 17 19:02:22 2001 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:02:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Martin Wedel sun@minor-element.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 6x0mp OS question Rowan, I ran redhat on mine for a time, and I currently run Solaris 2.5.1. As for the procs, open that bad boy up, carefully lift the proc cards and get the part # off of their connector. Then proceed to sunhelp.org to the hardware FAQ and look those up. Also, please respond back to either the list or me, I'm trying to make a small '670MP ownders group' of sorts to trade knowledge, parts, and ideas. Thanks, and have fun with your new toy. -- Martin Wedel sun@minor-element.net http://www.minor-element.net/ On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Any Key wrote: > Hello, > I see that several of you out there are running the 6xxMP series > of Suns. From what I know that 2.5.1 or 4.1.3_u were the last SunOS that > supported the machine. When I looked a few months ago the various > different *nix's didnt seem to have MP support available. > > I was wondering what the OS of Choice for MP support is? > > I have a 690MP myself though Its not 'up' at the moment, It was > given to me as a gift when the company that had it was going to dumpster > it because it had been EOL'd. I havent had time to try and get it going > yet. I have the Desk-side chassis, 256M of RAM and a 2.0G drive. Its a > Dual Processor, a Ross though I havent been able to find information > about what the card is. It is currently in storage so I cant get to it > really quick either (just moved). > > Rowan Hawkins > Jack-Of-All-Trades -- Master-Of-None (JOAT-MON) > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From bt@insiders-fs.com Mon Feb 19 09:51:31 2001 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:51:31 +0100 From: Volker Borchert bt@insiders-fs.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SunOS 4.1.x (Re: Solaris 2.3 manuals ) In message <200102171013.CAA28103@shell15.ba.best.com> you write: |> Personally, I'd say the most useful thing to have for a SS1+ is a |> newer OS. Solaris 2.6 will work on that machine, and won't be that |> much slower in non-graphic mode. NetBSD and OpenBSD both have stable, |> bootable support for it, and are pretty quick. Heck, if you want to |> run a commercial OS, find a 4.1.3 CD and go to (gnu) town. It'll be a lot |> more stable and efficient (and no worse for support) than 2.3. 4.1.4 will even be Y2K clean if patched properly. There are no Y2K patches for 4.1.3. Neither will support local disk partitions larger than 2 GB, though NFS mounting works. In this case, you'll need GNU "du" and "df" from the fileutils package to get reasonable output for such large partitions. You don't really need much more GNU stuff. You will certainly want gcc (be prepared, however, that the "make bootstrap" will take two days at least on a 4/65), top, lsof, and a decent shell. If you want to connect the box to the Internet, be sure to install sendmail-8.11.2 and bind-4.9.8 or bind-9.1.1 to fix some of the worst security problems. Volker From rbain@waldenweb.com Mon Feb 19 16:55:35 2001 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:55:35 -0600 From: Rik Bain rbain@waldenweb.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Sun SBE/S trouble I have a sbe/s card I am having trouble with. It is jumpered for 10BT and I have the sun cable (530-1813), but I cannot get it to work. I have tried a netgear 10BT hub and an old D-LINK hub. both of these work on the SS10 internal ethernet, as well as the SS2 ethernet with transceiver. A watch-net-all will sometimes give 1-3 "."'s on the lan traffic test, but then it stops. I was able to boot the machine and ping a host on the network, but only the first time. I would think if this were a problem with the link test, it would not work at all. Any insight/experience appreciated, as I dont know if I have a bad card or if I am doing something wrong. Rik Bain From mjpento@mediaone.net Tue Feb 20 00:04:55 2001 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:04:55 -0500 From: mjpento mjpento@mediaone.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Growing Partitions Hello Folks, I have a stupid newbie question. I am trying to find out how to grow a partition. I know there is a way to resize partitions without losing data, but I cannot seem to find any information on this anywhere. I first realized that I needed to resize my /opt partition when I tried to install Netscape and needed more space there. I am running Solaris 7 on a Sparcstation 5. Thanks, Mike From Jan@Bytesmiths.com Tue Feb 20 01:07:31 2001 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:07:31 -0800 From: Jan Steinman Jan@Bytesmiths.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] pretty printed man pages? I'm having a heck of a time getting nice man(1) output on a Postscript printer. I have installed the HP JetAdmin driver. It prints the Postcript test page okay. I can pump Postscript directly to lp(1). "man -t progname" gives me what appears to be dtroff output on the printer. I *can* do "troff -man manpage | dpost | lpr" and get proper output, but this does not work on SGML man pages, which are the vast majority of man pages. It seems it would work if I could only insert dpost(1) between "man -t" and "lp", but that all seems to happen inside man. On a whim, I did "export TROFF='troff | dpost'" but it barfed, indicating that it wasn't expecting a pipeline. I suppose I could write a simple script that took args and piped troff to dpost, and replace troff(1) with it, but it seems to me that something like this should already exist and be working! What am I not seeing here? -- : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 From dbwoodw@earthlink.net Tue Feb 20 02:55:07 2001 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 21:55:07 -0500 From: Don Woodward dbwoodw@earthlink.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] SunOS 4.1.x (Re: Solaris 2.3 manuals ) Not quite true - my "Sun Y2K Patches CD" has Y2K patches for SunOS 4.1.3U1vB and 4.1.4. Cheers, Don Woodward sales@sunsunsun.net www.sunsunsun.net "Volker Borchert" wrote... 4.1.4 will even be Y2K clean if patched properly. There are no Y2K patches for 4.1.3. From mpotter@atpco.com Tue Feb 20 03:44:27 2001 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:44:27 -0500 From: Matthew Potter mpotter@atpco.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 630mp I just got a 630mp, and i got two SM61 modules and two SM100(40x2cpu) modules? and I am wondering what configuration is faster? 4 40mhz cpus or 2 60mhz w/ cache From Jan@Bytesmiths.com Tue Feb 20 07:37:29 2001 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:37:29 -0800 From: Jan Steinman Jan@Bytesmiths.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sendmail/DNS woes... I'm seemingly unable to get sendmail and DNS working together properly. I have the Nutshell hand books "sendmail" and "DNS and BIND." They are older editions, but not THAT old. I've used them to successfully do it in the past, too! I can send mail OUT of my server. I can send mail into my server via bracketed IP notation: . (I haven't propagated my DNS info yet.) I can send mail inside my server, using either a naked user name, or using the actual name of the server I CANNOT mail to any CNAME aliases to the actual server name, nor to the bare domain name: . The mail bounces with: ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 554 MX list for bytesmiths.com. points back to ss20.bytesmiths.com 554 ... Local configuration error Reporting-MTA: dns; ss20.bytesmiths.com Received-From-MTA: DNS; macg4 Arrival-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:14:38 -0800 (PST) Final-Recipient: RFC822; jan@Bytesmiths.com Action: failed Status: 5.5.0 Remote-MTA: DNS; bytesmiths.com Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:14:38 -0800 (PST) ------------------------------------------------- (Note: my DNS is running locally, and the above domain addresses will not work for you.) Here are the MX records grepped out of my /etc/named files: ss20 IN MX 10 ss20 dns IN MX 10 dns ftp IN MX 10 ftp mail IN MX 10 mail www IN MX 10 www @ IN MX 10 ss20.bytesmiths.com. As far as I can tell, this is "by the book." Any clues? -- : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068, 503.635.3229 From huge@huge.org.uk Tue Feb 20 19:22:14 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:22:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Huge huge@huge.org.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Growing Partitions > I have a stupid newbie question. I am trying to find out how > to grow a partition. I know there is a way to resize partitions > without losing data, but I cannot seem to find any information on > this anywhere. I first realized that I needed to resize my /opt > partition when I tried to install Netscape and needed more space > there. I am running Solaris 7 on a Sparcstation 5. In essence, with standard Solaris software, you can't. You need one of the add-on disk management packages such as DiskSuite. Regards, Hugh. From david@catwhisker.org Tue Feb 20 20:54:12 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:54:12 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sendmail/DNS woes... >Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:37:29 -0800 >From: Jan Steinman >I'm seemingly unable to get sendmail and DNS working together properly. >I have the Nutshell hand books "sendmail" and "DNS and BIND." They >are older editions, but not THAT old. I've used them to successfully >do it in the past, too! :-} >.... >I CANNOT mail to any CNAME aliases to the actual server name, nor to >the bare domain name: . The mail bounces >with: > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > Well, it should be "interesting" to see the extent to which I'm successful in sending this, then. :-) > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >554 MX list for bytesmiths.com. points back to ss20.bytesmiths.com >554 ... Local configuration error >.... >(Note: my DNS is running locally, and the above domain addresses will >not work for you.) >Here are the MX records grepped out of my /etc/named files: >ss20 IN MX 10 ss20 >dns IN MX 10 dns >ftp IN MX 10 ftp >mail IN MX 10 mail >www IN MX 10 www >@ IN MX 10 ss20.bytesmiths.com. >As far as I can tell, this is "by the book." Any clues? Well, the rightmost field of an MX record needs to have a corresponding A record. You didn't show those... but "host -a -l bytesmiths.com" shows: rcode = 0 (Success), ancount=2 Found 1 addresses for NS2.INTEGRAONLINE.com Found 1 addresses for NS.INTEGRAONLINE.com Trying 64.122.32.10 bytesmiths.com 86400 IN SOA ns.integraonline.com hostmaster.integraonline.com( 2000071502 ;serial (version) 28800 ;refresh period 7200 ;retry refresh this often 604800 ;expiration period 86400 ;minimum TTL ) bytesmiths.com 86400 IN NS ns.integraonline.com bytesmiths.com 86400 IN NS ns2.integraonline.com bytesmiths.com 86400 IN MX 10 mail.bytesmiths.com ftp.bytesmiths.com 60 IN CNAME inet-bvtn.integraonline.com mail.bytesmiths.com 86400 IN CNAME mail1.integraonline.com www.bytesmiths.com 60 IN CNAME inet-bvtn.integraonline.com [Except that I elided the 2nd copy of the SOA (an artifact of "host") -- dhw.] In this case, the MX for bytesmiths.com points to mail.bytesmiths.com, which has no A record. That's wrong; fix it. Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. From jdavis@CS.Arizona.EDU Tue Feb 20 20:55:34 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:55:34 -0700 (MST) From: Jim Davis jdavis@CS.Arizona.EDU Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sendmail/DNS woes... On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jan Steinman wrote: > 554 MX list for bytesmiths.com. points back to ss20.bytesmiths.com > 554 ... Local configuration error You've consulted ? From huge@huge.org.uk Tue Feb 20 21:01:56 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:01:56 +0000 (GMT) From: Huge huge@huge.org.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] sendmail/DNS woes... Throw sendmail away.... Otherwise, that way lies madness. I cannot recommend Postfix enough! Regards, Hugh. From lakin@pgc.com Tue Feb 20 21:49:35 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 01 13:49:35 PST From: Fred Lakin lakin@pgc.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] can SunOS 4.1.4 ftp change permissions at remote end? Once again I have encounted the problem that I can't figure out how to change permissions from within ftp on files sent to a remote host. The sysadmin assures me he had done what is necessary at the remote end to allow me to do so (cgi scripts in a web directory). And, I must do all site admin through ftp since he allows no shell accounts. So, I am just so lame I don't know how to do this using the standard ftp that comes with 4.1.4? Or, is there some other ftp client I can install? I can't upgrade to Solaris for sfwr legacy reasons. tnx, -f From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Wed Feb 21 00:01:59 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:01:59 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: Growing Partitions "From: mjpento " " I have a stupid newbie question. I am trying to find out how "to grow a partition. I know there is a way to resize partitions "without losing data, but I cannot seem to find any information on "this anywhere. I first realized that I needed to resize my /opt "partition when I tried to install Netscape and needed more space "there. I am running Solaris 7 on a Sparcstation 5. if you've got disksuite running, read up on it. you can link free space anywhere to the /opt metadevice. if you don't, ds makes use of an undocumented option to solaris2 mkfs [-G iirc] which you can invoke directly, but the new space -must- add directly to the end of the original partition, which means if another partition was there you have to move it. in short, the best way to grow /opt is still the time-honored backup/reformat/restore. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From BehmJL@bvsg.com Tue Feb 20 21:39:54 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:39:54 -0600 From: Behm, Jeffrey L. BehmJL@bvsg.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Growing Partitions you could just make a new filesystem somewhere, mount it somewhere, and add links from the filesystem you need more space in (or just mount it directly somewhere where you need more space), although this makes your upgrading a lot harder if you are increasing / or /usr...YMMV I am not a "huge" (no pun intended) fan of this, but it may get you out of the immediate jam. Jeff >-----Original Message----- >From: huge@huge.org.uk [mailto:huge@huge.org.uk] >Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 01 1:22 PM >To: suns-at-home@net-kitchen.com; mjpento@mediaone.net >Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Growing Partitions > > > >> I have a stupid newbie question. I am trying to find out how >> to grow a partition. I know there is a way to resize partitions >> without losing data, but I cannot seem to find any information on >> this anywhere. I first realized that I needed to resize my /opt >> partition when I tried to install Netscape and needed more space >> there. I am running Solaris 7 on a Sparcstation 5. > >In essence, with standard Solaris software, you can't. > >You need one of the add-on disk management packages such as DiskSuite. > >Regards, > >Hugh. >_______________________________________________ >Suns-at-Home mailing list >Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com >http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From paul@anastrophe.com Tue Feb 20 22:25:05 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:25:05 GMT From: paul@anastrophe.com paul@anastrophe.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 630mp The dual SM61's will be far and away the fastest config. The SM100's are stinkers, by just about any measure. Matthew Potter writes: > I just got a 630mp, and i got two SM61 modules and two SM100(40x2cpu) modules? and I am wondering what configuration is faster? 4 40mhz cpus or 2 60mhz w/ cache > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home --------------------------------- Paul Theodoropoulos paul@anastrophe.net Senior Unix Systems Administrator Syntactically Subversive Services, Inc. http://www.anastrophe.net Downtime Is Not An Option From pinky@braincenter.de Tue Feb 20 22:39:00 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:39:00 +0100 From: Dirk Stapels pinky@braincenter.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 630mp Hi Matthew, I would prefer the SM61's 'cause the Ross SM100 modules are very slow so even two of them are slower than a single SuperSparc. Matthew Potter schrieb: > I just got a 630mp, and i got two SM61 modules and two SM100(40x2cpu) modules? and I am wondering what configuration is faster? 4 40mhz cpus or 2 60mhz w/ cache > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Tue Feb 20 23:41:30 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:41:30 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 630mp "From: Matthew Potter " "I just got a 630mp, and i got two SM61 modules and two SM100(40x2cpu) modules? and I am wondering what configuration is faster? 4 40mhz cpus or 2 60mhz w/ cache the sm61 supersparcs are -way- faster than the older sm100 sun4c, and they run solaris 8 too. i'd go with the supers. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Tue Feb 20 23:44:12 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:44:12 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] pretty printed man pages? "From: Jan Steinman [] "I *can* do "troff -man manpage | dpost | lpr" and get proper output, "but this does not work on SGML man pages, which are the vast majority "of man pages. " "It seems it would work if I could only insert dpost(1) between "man "-t" and "lp", but that all seems to happen inside man. On a whim, I "did "export TROFF='troff | dpost'" but it barfed, indicating that it "wasn't expecting a pipeline. you could try export MANPAGER=dpost "What am I not seeing here? i believe the original sun lp interface scripts autodetect troff input and run dpost on it. it appears that the hp jetdirect scripts don't. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Tue Feb 20 23:54:00 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:54:00 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 6x0mp OS question "From: Any Key " " I see that several of you out there are running the 6xxMP series "of Suns. From what I know that 2.5.1 or 4.1.3_u were the last SunOS that "supported the machine. When I looked a few months ago the various "different *nix's didnt seem to have MP support available. " " I was wondering what the OS of Choice for MP support is? between those two, 2.5.1. 4.1.4 is mp-safe but very crude at juggling more than one processor; it's also the first one to support ross cpus. earlier 4.1 are prone to seize unexpectedly with mp and wouldn't run on your system without the ross patch anyway. " I have a 690MP myself though Its not 'up' at the moment, It was [] "yet. I have the Desk-side chassis, 256M of RAM and a 2.0G drive. Its a ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ nit: this would make it a >630<. the >690< was in a full-height rack. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From schiller@agrijag.com Wed Feb 21 01:24:38 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:24:38 -0500 From: Michael Schiller schiller@agrijag.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 630mp Ok, similar question: In a 690MP which would be the faster setup, 4 50mhz supersparcs (SM520 & SM521) or 2 SM61's? -Mike Sandwich Maker wrote: > "From: Matthew Potter > " > "I just got a 630mp, and i got two SM61 modules and two SM100(40x2cpu) modules? and I am wondering what configuration is faster? 4 40mhz cpus or 2 60mhz w/ cache > > the sm61 supersparcs are -way- faster than the older sm100 sun4c, and > they run solaris 8 too. i'd go with the supers. > _____________________________________________________________________ > Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor > internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more > adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PGP fingerprint= D2 4F A8 B7 13 D5 73 1E 48 99 40 99 F9 BC 74 74 Email: schiller@agrijag.com Web: http://www.agrijag.com Voice: 423-625-6349 FAX: 423-623-9054 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * From airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Wed Feb 21 01:43:55 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:43:55 -0600 (CST) From: Dan Debertin airboss@dusk.bitstream.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] wavy screen I have an ELC (sun4c) workstation that is beginning to show its age. The screen is intermittently wavy, especially around the edges. I've moved all other monitors over 5 feet away; it doesn't seem to be related to anything in the room. Is there anything I can do, or is this box on its way out? Thanks, Dan Debertin airboss@dusk.bitstream.net From sun@minor-element.net Wed Feb 21 03:05:17 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 03:05:17 +0000 (GMT) From: Martin Wedel sun@minor-element.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 6x0mp OS question > "yet. I have the Desk-side chassis, 256M of RAM and a 2.0G drive. Its a > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > nit: this would make it a >630<. the >690< was in a full-height rack. > _____________________________________________________________________ Not to nitpick, but it would make it a 670 or 630. If I recall correctly, the 690 is the 'cabinet' sized system, 16 9U VME slots, the 670 is a 12 9U slot deskside, and the 630 is a 3 x 9U and 2 x 6U VME-Bus. I'd like a good picture of someones 630 if possile, I've been toying with running one down to save a little space by 'downgrading' one of my 670's -Martin www.minor-element.net From adh@an.bradford.ma.us Wed Feb 21 13:45:29 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:45:29 -0500 (EST) From: Sandwich Maker adh@an.bradford.ma.us Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: Re: 630mp "From: Michael Schiller " "Ok, similar question: In a 690MP which would be the faster setup, 4 50mhz supersparcs (SM520 & SM521) or 2 SM61's? if the 50s have cache and your os [eg. solaris2] and app really handle mp well [also if you have a mess o' little apps], they would be. with 4.1.4, i suspect you'd get better results out of the 61s. _____________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay 'Tis not he who has but little that's poor internet rambler But he who ever desires yet more adh@an.bradford.ma.us Celtic proverb (tr.) From henrik@larsson.net Wed Feb 21 09:58:16 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:58:16 +0100 From: Henrik Larsson henrik@larsson.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] "Autoconfig error, your compiler doesn't seem to support any 32 bit type" Hello, I have a SparcStation 4/110 running Solaris 8 and I am currently trying to install ssh-2.4.0 on it. Before I got through the configure step, I had to install gcc, autoconf, make etc. from sunfreeware.com so that problem (which seems to be common) belongs to the past. Now I am instead stuck in the step of compiling (make). I'll get this after just a few seconds of compiling... "sshincludes_unix.h:51: #error "Autoconfig error, your compiler doesn't seem to support any 32 bit type" My config.log is available at http://c249.ryd.student.liu.se/config.log The only solution I have got so far is too reinstall my Solaris 8 as an "developer" install, but so much space on my hd isn't available and I think it is quite a "avoid the problem" solution. Isn't there anyone here who knows what to install from source or as a SUNW* package? Another "solution" (to a similar problem on a different platform) that I've seen is http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/530/2000/6/0/3966116/ , but I don't want to do like that. Isn't there any other way? Can't find anything about the above in this list's archive. If there aren't any solution for the above problem. I am mainly interested in getting a ssh2 client with support for X forwarding installed on my system. So how do I instead do that? OpenSSH...? Thanks in advance, Henrik Larsson Sweden From martincarpenter@hotmail.com Wed Feb 21 08:00:04 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:00:04 -0000 From: Martin Carpenter martincarpenter@hotmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] can SunOS 4.1.4 ftp change permissions at remote end? >Once again I have encounted the problem that I can't >figure out how to change permissions from within ftp >on files sent to a remote host. > >[snip] > >So, I am just so lame I don't know how to do this using >the standard ftp that comes with 4.1.4? You probably don't need a newer client - but the server may not allow you to do what you want. Changing permissions on files is not defined by RFC 959. >From the client's perspective, try "site chmod 644 filename" (or whatever). If it (the *client*) complains that it doesn't know about "site" then you could try "quote site chmod 644 filename". Any messages preceeded by 3 digits are (probably) coming back from the server, not the client. If you want to invest in a new client, then I quite like lftp (it has nice mirroring options that might interest you?). The source is out there somewhere... Martin. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From dowdy@cs.colorado.edu Wed Feb 21 04:50:23 2001 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:50:23 -0700 (MST) From: Stephen Dowdy dowdy@cs.colorado.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 6x0mp OS question Martin, Martin Wedel wrote: > Not to nitpick, but it would make it a 670 or 630. If I recall correctly, > the 690 is the 'cabinet' sized system, 16 9U VME slots, the 670 is a 12 > 9U slot deskside, and the 630 is a 3 x 9U and 2 x 6U VME-Bus. Actually, i believe the 670 was slightly smaller than the 690 (12 VME vs 16), but still not a deskside. The 630 is a 12-slot desk-side pedestal. (i'd say a 690 was "refrigerator" class, and the 670 was "cabinet" class) You are thinking of the 4/330 chassis. Kind of a cool box, It also had 2 3U slots for Memory cards that were linear to the 6U's (making a 9U slot total physically, though the P1/P2+P3 buses were electrically isolated) > I'd like a good picture of someones 630 if possile, I've been toying with > running one down to save a little space by 'downgrading' one of my 670's I have a couple of 630 chassis, one still in use. It's about the size of a 4/330 chassis but about 50% wider. I've blown 2 power supplies on these, and i understand that's a common failure mode :-(. The 630 has a 4-bay SCSI rack internal on top and was usually populated with the old Seagate 1.3GB IPI-class SCSI drives.. woohoo, and a CDROM or Tape. I *think* you can install a 600 VME board into a 4/330 chassis as long as you don't care to use any other VME peripherals/memory boards. (just use it for power) I could be wrong, though. (i seem to recall someone saying they'd used a 3/110 chassis with a galaxy (/600) motherboard, too) --stephen -- Stephen Dowdy - Systems Administrator - CS Dept - Univ of Colorado at Boulder dowdy@cs.colorado.edu -- http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~dowdy/signature.html From v_bender@hotmail.com Wed Feb 21 17:06:02 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:06:02 +0200 From: v b v_bender@hotmail.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: Growing Partitions >" I have a stupid newbie question. I am trying to find out how >"to grow a partition. I know there is a way to resize partitions >"without losing data, but I cannot seem to find any information on >"this anywhere. I first realized that I needed to resize my /opt >"partition when I tried to install Netscape and needed more space >"there. I am running Solaris 7 on a Sparcstation 5. > >if you've got disksuite running, read up on it. you can link free >space anywhere to the /opt metadevice. > >if you don't, ds makes use of an undocumented option to solaris2 mkfs >[-G iirc] which you can invoke directly, but the new space -must- add >directly to the end of the original partition, which means if another >partition was there you have to move it. in short, the best way to >grow /opt is still the time-honored backup/reformat/restore. When ever a machine is built, make sure around 16MB are left unallocated on every disk that will be added to the machine. This is smart planning for future scalability. The space is needed to hold a raw partition that will house a meta database. After the machine is built, the next thing to do is to install Solstice DiskSuite which comes free with Solaris8, and offers on-the-fly FileSystem growth, mirroring, hot spares, and RAID capabilities, to name a few. I never build a corporate server without doing the above. It saved my butt numerous times and it comes in real handy when the servers run out of disk space. Stick an additional disk on the machine, partition and newfs the disk, grow the existing FS and off you go. With the mirroring capability of DiskSuite, you can replace a bad / dead disk by just sticking it in the machine, it will be rebuilt automatically (but you still have to detach and attach the mirror). And BTW, when you admin a production environment with lots of machines, backing up / repartitioning / reformating is not an option since downtime is impossible to get, and time is worth as much as solid gold. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From pinky@braincenter.de Wed Feb 21 17:38:14 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:38:14 +0100 From: Dirk Stapels pinky@braincenter.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 6x0mp OS question Hi, just to let you know. I have a galaxy running in a 3/260. Works fine. Tried to get the 512 MB extension to run which was absolut impossible though i got a lot of help and info from here. So if someone in or around germany has a spare 6x0 chassis i would be interressted. Dirk Stephen Dowdy schrieb: > Martin, > > Martin Wedel wrote: > > Not to nitpick, but it would make it a 670 or 630. If I recall correctly, > > the 690 is the 'cabinet' sized system, 16 9U VME slots, the 670 is a 12 > > 9U slot deskside, and the 630 is a 3 x 9U and 2 x 6U VME-Bus. > > Actually, i believe the 670 was slightly smaller than the 690 (12 VME vs > 16), but still not a deskside. The 630 is a 12-slot desk-side pedestal. > (i'd say a 690 was "refrigerator" class, and the 670 was "cabinet" class) > > You are thinking of the 4/330 chassis. Kind of a cool box, It also had 2 > 3U slots for Memory cards that were linear to the 6U's (making a 9U slot > total physically, though the P1/P2+P3 buses were electrically isolated) > > > I'd like a good picture of someones 630 if possile, I've been toying with > > running one down to save a little space by 'downgrading' one of my 670's > > I have a couple of 630 chassis, one still in use. It's about the size of > a 4/330 chassis but about 50% wider. I've blown 2 power supplies on these, > and i understand that's a common failure mode :-(. The 630 has a 4-bay SCSI > rack internal on top and was usually populated with the old Seagate 1.3GB > IPI-class SCSI drives.. woohoo, and a CDROM or Tape. > > I *think* you can install a 600 VME board into a 4/330 chassis as long as > you don't care to use any other VME peripherals/memory boards. (just use > it for power) I could be wrong, though. (i seem to recall someone saying > they'd used a 3/110 chassis with a galaxy (/600) motherboard, too) > > --stephen > -- > Stephen Dowdy - Systems Administrator - CS Dept - Univ of Colorado at Boulder > dowdy@cs.colorado.edu -- http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~dowdy/signature.html > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From nrichard@chem.wayne.edu Wed Feb 21 16:40:06 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:40:06 -0400 From: Nick Richardson nrichard@chem.wayne.edu Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Re: 6x0mp OS question At 9:50 PM -0700 2/20/01, Stephen Dowdy wrote: >Martin, > >Martin Wedel wrote: >> Not to nitpick, but it would make it a 670 or 630. If I recall correctly, >> the 690 is the 'cabinet' sized system, 16 9U VME slots, the 670 is a 12 >> 9U slot deskside, and the 630 is a 3 x 9U and 2 x 6U VME-Bus. > >Actually, i believe the 670 was slightly smaller than the 690 (12 VME vs >16), but still not a deskside. The 630 is a 12-slot desk-side pedestal. >(i'd say a 690 was "refrigerator" class, and the 670 was "cabinet" class) > >You are thinking of the 4/330 chassis. Kind of a cool box, It also had 2 >3U slots for Memory cards that were linear to the 6U's (making a 9U slot >total physically, though the P1/P2+P3 buses were electrically isolated) > >> I'd like a good picture of someones 630 if possile, I've been toying with >> running one down to save a little space by 'downgrading' one of my 670's > >I have a couple of 630 chassis, one still in use. It's about the size of >a 4/330 chassis but about 50% wider. I've blown 2 power supplies on these, >and i understand that's a common failure mode :-(. The 630 has a 4-bay SCSI >rack internal on top and was usually populated with the old Seagate 1.3GB >IPI-class SCSI drives.. woohoo, and a CDROM or Tape. > >I *think* you can install a 600 VME board into a 4/330 chassis as long as >you don't care to use any other VME peripherals/memory boards. (just use >it for power) I could be wrong, though. (i seem to recall someone saying >they'd used a 3/110 chassis with a galaxy (/600) motherboard, too) > >--stephen Just to confirm, you can put a 600 VME board in a 4/330 chassis, as I did this last weekend and everything seems to work fine. I just use the chassis to supply the power for the board and the SCSI devices (hard drive, CD and tape). Nick Richardson From nico@gartengold.de Fri Feb 23 20:25:53 2001 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:25:53 +0100 From: Nico Goldschmidt nico@gartengold.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Solaris on JavaStation? Hello, I'm thinking about buying a JavaStation 1 (Mr. Coffee) for my collection which should be used for web-surfing. The original software combination netra-j, JavaOS and HotJava seems not to be satisfying for that purpose, so I want to run it as a diskless workstation, preferably under Solaris like the SPARCclassic X or XTerminal 1. AFAIK, the JavaStation is basically a SPARCstation 4 without SCSI/HDD/Floppy/CD-ROM/SBus and running Linux and NetBSD via dhcp, bootp, tftp, etc. is no problem. So I guess it is possible to load a Solaris kernel, but will it work on that Hardware? At least the OpenBoot ist different to other SUNs. I found no hints on this issue in the usenet, so any help would be appreciated, Nico From mpotter@atpco.com Fri Feb 23 21:27:16 2001 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:27:16 -0500 From: Matthew Potter mpotter@atpco.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] 4/6XX bootprom question I have the following boot proms, and am unable to look the serial #'s up I think these are the orginal boot proms(it was later upgraded to SM61's), for the 4/6XX series. one set of 4 chips 525-12XX XX=09-12 the other set 525-11XX-04 (A) XX=68-71 anyone know the specs on these? Why does the 4/630mp have 4 boot proms anyways? Matt From bcook@idsi.net Fri Feb 23 22:42:13 2001 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:42:13 -0500 From: B. Cook bcook@idsi.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Couple of Ultra1's.. I just got some Ultra1 170's from a company that was using them as web servers.. well, I'm trying to install netbsd on them and they keep dying on the install.. Well, I decided that I should try and install Solaris and see what it says about the hardware.. It's got OpenBoot 3.5 and when I boot solaris 5.8 it says... Notice: The firmware on this system does not support the 64-bit OS. Please upgrade to at least OBP 3.11.1 1997/12/03 16:43 Booting the 32-bit OS I have the solaris 8 CD set with the (what I think) are boot proms that I can use/upgrade to. But when I follow the directions that say to take out the sbus card, move the jumper over, and reboot the system and follow the directions.. there are no directions that come up. So I'm kinda at a loss.. Any one have any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Brian From rnovak@indyramp.com Sat Feb 24 01:09:26 2001 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:09:26 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Novak rnovak@indyramp.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) I thought I heard a "B. Cook" say: > > I just got some Ultra1 170's from a company that was using them as web > servers.. Quickie URLs. Pull the appropriate one up while you read on. Ultra 1 170: http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches%2F104881 Ultra 1 170E: http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches%2F104288 > I have the solaris 8 CD set with the (what I think) are boot proms that I > can use/upgrade to. But when I follow the directions that say to take out > the sbus card, move the jumper over, and reboot the system and follow the > directions.. there are no directions that come up. So I'm kinda at a loss.. > > Any one have any suggestions? The instructions are on the OBP update cd, or you can check the appropriate URL above for the latest OBP level (as of 5 minutes ago) and complete instructions. If you want to get the latest version and the above are no longer current (i.e. if you're reading this in the archives) try going to http://sunsolve.sun.com/ and searching for "ultra 1 obp" (or whatever model you may have). The key is you have to copy the upgrade binary to your root filesystem, power down, adjust the appropriate jumper, and then boot that binary file. The instructions in the above urls are pretty clear on the process... wasn't obvious to me the first time I tried either. Read the instructions carefully, make sure you know you could cause the end of civilization as we know it (or at least disable your system) if you mess up the update, and good luck! --Rob -- Robert Novak, Indyramp Consulting * rnovak@indyramp.com * indyramp.com/~rnovak "And it's been a long December and there's reason to believe Maybe this year will be better than the last...." -- counting crows From pinky@braincenter.de Sat Feb 24 01:22:22 2001 Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 02:22:22 +0100 From: Dirk Stapels pinky@braincenter.de Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Couple of Ultra1's.. Hi, it is quiet easy. Go to the Sun Documentation Server ( docs.sun.com ). Get the Solaris 8 Guide. Look for the page where they describe the boot prom upgrade. Print it !!! Take your sun and follow the orders you printed. :-) regards Dirk "B. Cook" schrieb: > I just got some Ultra1 170's from a company that was using them as web > servers.. > > well, I'm trying to install netbsd on them and they keep dying on the > install.. Well, I decided that I should try and install Solaris and see what > it says about the hardware.. > > It's got OpenBoot 3.5 and when I boot solaris 5.8 it says... > > Notice: The firmware on this system does not support the 64-bit OS. Please > upgrade to at least > > OBP 3.11.1 1997/12/03 16:43 > > Booting the 32-bit OS > > I have the solaris 8 CD set with the (what I think) are boot proms that I > can use/upgrade to. But when I follow the directions that say to take out > the sbus card, move the jumper over, and reboot the system and follow the > directions.. there are no directions that come up. So I'm kinda at a loss.. > > Any one have any suggestions? > > Thanks in advance. > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home From huge@huge.org.uk Sat Feb 24 12:20:32 2001 Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:20:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Huge huge@huge.org.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) > From: rnovak@indyramp.com (Robert Novak) > The key is you have to copy the upgrade binary to your root filesystem, > power down, adjust the appropriate jumper, and then boot that binary file. Or just install Solaris 8, set the jumper and reboot. H. From bcook@idsi.net Sun Feb 25 19:04:28 2001 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:04:28 -0500 From: B. Cook bcook@idsi.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Nevermind.. I found it :p I have to Become root and change the default kernel from 32-bit to 64-bit by editing the /platform/platform-name/boot.conf file. i.e. # cd /platform/sun4u/ # ls boot.conf cprboot cprbooter kadb kernel ufsboot # vi boot.conf Uncomment the line ALLOW_64BIT_KERNEL_ON_UltraSPARC_1_CPU=true. :P Not sure why this didn't come up the first hundred times I looked for it :) Thanks anyway.. Brian From bcook@idsi.net Sun Feb 25 18:44:02 2001 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:44:02 -0500 From: B. Cook bcook@idsi.net Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) Thanks for all the help :) I went to the site and followed the directions and all went well :) OpenBoot Prom 3.25 for the Ultra1's and 3.27 on the Ultra10 :) well, now for the next question in this adventure.. I thought all the Ultra's were 64bit - hence the name. Upon booting solaris 8 (prior to the obp upgrade) I got the previous message saying " Notice: The firmware on this system does not support the 64-bit OS. Please upgrade to at least OBP 3.11.1 1997/12/03 16:43 Booting the 32-bit OS" Well now it says: Notice: 64-bit OS installed but the 32-bit OS is the default for teh processor(s) on this system Other than the obvious what does this mean? That the UltraSparc 170 isn't an UltraSparc? but a regular Sparc? like I could upgrade a Sparc5 to? appreciating any words of wizdom :) Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Novak" To: "B. Cook" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 8:09 PM Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) > I thought I heard a "B. Cook" say: > > > > I just got some Ultra1 170's from a company that was using them as web > > servers.. > > Quickie URLs. Pull the appropriate one up while you read on. > > Ultra 1 170: > http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches%2F104881 > Ultra 1 170E: > http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches%2F104288 > > > I have the solaris 8 CD set with the (what I think) are boot proms that I > > can use/upgrade to. But when I follow the directions that say to take out > > the sbus card, move the jumper over, and reboot the system and follow the > > directions.. there are no directions that come up. So I'm kinda at a loss.. > > > > Any one have any suggestions? > > The instructions are on the OBP update cd, or you can check the > appropriate URL above for the latest OBP level (as of 5 minutes ago) and > complete instructions. If you want to get the latest version and the above > are no longer current (i.e. if you're reading this in the archives) try > going to http://sunsolve.sun.com/ and searching for "ultra 1 obp" (or > whatever model you may have). > > The key is you have to copy the upgrade binary to your root filesystem, > power down, adjust the appropriate jumper, and then boot that binary file. > The instructions in the above urls are pretty clear on the process... > wasn't obvious to me the first time I tried either. > > Read the instructions carefully, make sure you know you could cause the > end of civilization as we know it (or at least disable your system) if you > mess up the update, and good luck! > > --Rob > > -- > Robert Novak, Indyramp Consulting * rnovak@indyramp.com * indyramp.com/~rnovak > "And it's been a long December and there's reason to believe > Maybe this year will be better than the last...." -- counting crows > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From rnovak@indyramp.com Mon Feb 26 02:26:27 2001 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 18:26:27 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Novak rnovak@indyramp.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) I thought I heard a "B. Cook" say: > > I thought all the Ultra's were 64bit - hence the name. > > Notice: 64-bit OS installed but the 32-bit OS is the default for the > processor(s) on this system > > Other than the obvious what does this mean? That the UltraSparc 170 isn't > an UltraSparc? but a regular Sparc? like I could upgrade a Sparc5 to? It means there's a bit of an issue with the Ultra 1 processor in 64-bit mode, described (I believe) in the boot.conf file. You can probably upgrade a Sparc 5 to an Ultra with a Cycle board swap, but anymore it's not cost effective from what I hear. Cycle boards are still pretty expensive, and an Ultra 1 from Sun goes for only about $700? (store.sun.com under remanufactured workstations).... --Rob -- Robert Novak, Indyramp Consulting * rnovak@indyramp.com * indyramp.com/~rnovak "And it's been a long December and there's reason to believe Maybe this year will be better than the last...." -- counting crows From Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com Mon Feb 26 03:26:34 2001 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:26:34 -0800 From: Kevin Stevens Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) Man boot and look at the notes at the end. There is/was some kind of security exploit possible on the <200MHz Ultras, so Sun defaults them to a 32-bit kernel. In the notes it explains the file and variable to modify to default to the 64-bit kernel instead. KeS ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. Cook" To: Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10:44 Subject: Re: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) > Thanks for all the help :) > > I went to the site and followed the directions and all went well :) > > OpenBoot Prom 3.25 for the Ultra1's and 3.27 on the Ultra10 :) > > well, now for the next question in this adventure.. > > I thought all the Ultra's were 64bit - hence the name. Upon booting solaris > 8 (prior to the obp upgrade) I got the previous message saying > " Notice: The firmware on this system does not support the 64-bit OS. > Please > upgrade to at least > > OBP 3.11.1 1997/12/03 16:43 > > Booting the 32-bit OS" > > Well now it says: > > Notice: 64-bit OS installed but the 32-bit OS is the default for teh > processor(s) on this system > > Other than the obvious what does this mean? That the UltraSparc 170 isn't > an UltraSparc? but a regular Sparc? like I could upgrade a Sparc5 to? > > appreciating any words of wizdom :) > > Brian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Novak" > To: "B. Cook" > Cc: > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 8:09 PM > Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) > > > > I thought I heard a "B. Cook" say: > > > > > > I just got some Ultra1 170's from a company that was using them as web > > > servers.. > > > > Quickie URLs. Pull the appropriate one up while you read on. > > > > Ultra 1 170: > > http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches%2F104881 > > Ultra 1 170E: > > http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches%2F104288 > > > > > I have the solaris 8 CD set with the (what I think) are boot proms that > I > > > can use/upgrade to. But when I follow the directions that say to take > out > > > the sbus card, move the jumper over, and reboot the system and follow > the > > > directions.. there are no directions that come up. So I'm kinda at a > loss.. > > > > > > Any one have any suggestions? > > > > The instructions are on the OBP update cd, or you can check the > > appropriate URL above for the latest OBP level (as of 5 minutes ago) and > > complete instructions. If you want to get the latest version and the above > > are no longer current (i.e. if you're reading this in the archives) try > > going to http://sunsolve.sun.com/ and searching for "ultra 1 obp" (or > > whatever model you may have). > > > > The key is you have to copy the upgrade binary to your root filesystem, > > power down, adjust the appropriate jumper, and then boot that binary file. > > The instructions in the above urls are pretty clear on the process... > > wasn't obvious to me the first time I tried either. > > > > Read the instructions carefully, make sure you know you could cause the > > end of civilization as we know it (or at least disable your system) if you > > mess up the update, and good luck! > > > > --Rob > > > > -- > > Robert Novak, Indyramp Consulting * rnovak@indyramp.com * > indyramp.com/~rnovak > > "And it's been a long December and there's reason to believe > > Maybe this year will be better than the last...." -- counting > crows > > _______________________________________________ > > Suns-at-Home mailing list > > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > > > > _______________________________________________ > Suns-at-Home mailing list > Suns-at-Home@net-kitchen.com > http://www.net-kitchen.com/mailman/listinfo/suns-at-home > From jeffw@smoe.org Mon Feb 26 02:24:07 2001 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:24:07 -0500 From: Jeff Wasilko jeffw@smoe.org Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:44:02PM -0500, B. Cook wrote: > Well now it says: > > Notice: 64-bit OS installed but the 32-bit OS is the default for teh > processor(s) on this system > > Other than the obvious what does this mean? That the UltraSparc 170 isn't > an UltraSparc? but a regular Sparc? like I could upgrade a Sparc5 to? > > appreciating any words of wizdom :) There is a bug in the Ultrasparc I cpus that can allow a non-root user to hang the system. Apparently it requires hand-generated assembly code, so the likelyhood that it will affect a real system is slight. However, Sun chose to make the default mode for US-I based systems 32-bit. -jeff From timl@scintilla.utwente.nl Mon Feb 26 23:51:57 2001 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 00:51:57 +0100 (CET) From: Tim ter Laak timl@scintilla.utwente.nl Subject: [Suns-at-Home] VGA monitor on sun3/60 mono ecl? Hello, Recently I saved a headless sun3/60 from the scrapheap, just to play something with netbooting and linux-68k. I will be setting up a serial connection to my PC with terminal-emulation anyway, but just for the fun of it I'd also like to put a monitor on this sun. Current VGA monitors should be able to work at the (for that time) crazy frequencies sun's use for video, but I'm not sure how to connect the actual video signal. As stated in subject, my 3/60 has just it's standard mono framebuffer, with a 9-pin D-connector and "ECL output" for the actual video signal (so not the sync-signals if I understand correctly). Perhaps anyone of you has done this before and can tell me how? (Or can tell me he blew up 2 well working monitors in the attempt :-) Please mail me at timl*AT*scintilla.utwente.nl, because I'm not on this list. Kind regards, Tim ter Laak. From bt@insiders-fs.com Tue Feb 27 09:56:46 2001 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:56:46 +0100 From: Volker Borchert bt@insiders-fs.com Subject: [Suns-at-Home] VGA monitor on sun3/60 mono ecl? In message you write: |> Recently I saved a headless sun3/60 from the scrapheap, Where is this scrap heap? Is there any more Sun stuff on it? |> something with netbooting and linux-68k. You are aware that you can download SunOS 4.1.1 and the _U1 update package from http://sun3arc.krupp.net/ ? |> As stated in subject, my 3/60 has just it's standard mono framebuffer, |> with a 9-pin D-connector and "ECL output" for the actual video signal (so |> not the sync-signals if I understand correctly). Video is ECL, Sync is TTL. |> Perhaps anyone of you has done this before and can tell me how? You would need level converters, or you could try to modify the frame buffer so that it outputs analog video. Since we are talking VHF here, this is probably not a project for beginners. Another solution would be to hunt a little for a color frame buffer and a 13W3->VGA adaptor cable. |> Please mail me at timl*AT*scintilla.utwente.nl, because I'm not |> on this list. This is not how mailing lists work. Regards, Volker From timl@scintilla.utwente.nl Tue Feb 27 12:52:07 2001 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:52:07 +0100 (CET) From: Tim ter Laak timl@scintilla.utwente.nl Subject: [Suns-at-Home] VGA monitor on sun3/60 mono ecl? First I'd like to apologize for mailing to this list without subscription. I never noticed it to be a problem on other lists I am subscribed to, but of course this can vary from list to list. So sorry to the people who where offended by it. On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Volker Borchert wrote: > In message you write: > > |> Recently I saved a headless sun3/60 from the scrapheap, > > Where is this scrap heap? Is there any more Sun stuff on it? > Nope. This was the only sun, the rest are mainly Olivetti's. > |> something with netbooting and linux-68k. > > You are aware that you can download SunOS 4.1.1 and the _U1 > update package from http://sun3arc.krupp.net/ ? Yes. I might try that too. But I will have to try if I can just untar it and put it on a TFTP / NFS server. Anybody tried that? > > |> As stated in subject, my 3/60 has just it's standard mono framebuffer, > |> with a 9-pin D-connector and "ECL output" for the actual video signal (so > |> not the sync-signals if I understand correctly). > > Video is ECL, Sync is TTL. > > |> Perhaps anyone of you has done this before and can tell me how? > > You would need level converters, or you could try to modify the > frame buffer so that it outputs analog video. Since we are > talking VHF here, this is probably not a project for beginners. Well, I do have a fair amount of electronics experience. But what most troubles me is that the ECL video signal seems to be on 2 pins, and that according to ECL-logic manufacturers ECL signals are ALWAYS negative. Add to that that most connector descriptions I found differ slightly from one another. Grtz, Tim. From David.Richerby@cl.cam.ac.uk Tue Feb 27 17:51:05 2001 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:51:05 +0000 From: David Richerby David.Richerby@cl.cam.ac.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Ultra1 OBP update (was Re: Couple of Ultra1's..) Jeff Wasilko wrote (on Sun, 25 February): > There is a bug in the Ultrasparc I cpus that can allow a > non-root user to hang the system. Apparently it requires > hand-generated assembly code, so the likelyhood that it will > affect a real system is slight. Unless somebody publishes the exploit, in which case the chances of it happening to your machine depend on who uses it. I've not been able to find any concrete information about this bug anywhere on the web; Sun have not published details. Dave. From timl@scintilla.utwente.nl Tue Feb 27 19:10:12 2001 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:10:12 +0100 (CET) From: Tim ter Laak timl@scintilla.utwente.nl Subject: [Suns-at-Home] VGA monitor on sun3/60 mono ecl? > |> Well, I do have a fair amount of electronics experience. But what most > > With 60+ MHz analog signals, which is what you have on the VGA > side? > > If so, take a close look at the frame buffer. On my SBus ECL b/w > frame buffers, it seems that only the driver stage is ECL, and > that it uses TTL->ECL drivers (Motorola 10H). I'd try > to tap the TTL level side - then a passive resistor network with > what in German is called an "emitter follower" might do. > Thanks for the tip. Seems that with mine too only output stage is ECL. It would indeed be nonsense to convert a signal that has already be converted. I readily admit that these frequencies aren't a piece of cake, but it can be done. Especially since I'm not expecting "commercial quality" :-) > > |> Add to that that most connector descriptions I found differ slightly from > |> one another. > > Do you have access to an oscilloscope? After all, it's only nine > pins... > Unfortunately not, at least not to scopes that work with 60+ Mhz signals. But my doubts were focused on the ECL signals. And I have found schematics of my 3/60, which will also help in locating the needed TTL video signal. Tim. From alexios@vennea.demon.co.uk Tue Feb 27 20:05:02 2001 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:05:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Alexios Chouchoulas alexios@vennea.demon.co.uk Subject: [Suns-at-Home] Any Sun kit for sale in the UK? Hello folks! I've an old 3/160 which I don't really run (1.2 kW PSU, you see), but I'd like to get a more recent machine. Something sun4-ish would be nice, preferably something that can run *BSD or Linux. Do you know of any 2nd hand kit for sale around in the UK or nearby EU countries? If there's any in Edinburgh, so much the better. No shipping required. :-) Alexios =----------------------------------------------= 64*>:00p258**44$$^>4$,1-:#v_v | Alexios Chouchoulas, the Unpronounceable One | 4$#^; BEFUNGE97 ;^#_@#:-1$>#< | http://www.vennea.demon.co.uk/ | 4*2-*26g00*:-*58: